[anne666]

Lets just wait for the next excuse for Hazel to be ejected.

[Northern Monkey]

Daley should have just pulled Hazels pants down instead of going all radgy like he did.Same punishment for both then!

[the truth]

Originally Posted by EyeballPaul

Daley should have just pulled Hazels pants down instead of going all radgy like he did.Same punishment for both then!

he would have been booted for that.....no man would ever be allowed to get away with that, so neither shuld any woman like hazel or denise

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by the truth

he would have been booted for that.....no man would ever be allowed to get away with that, so neither shuld any woman like hazel or denise

Shall I just keep repeating this until it finally sinks into your head?

These are facts.

Sam Pepper thrust his crotch in Josies face-Wasn't kicked out.

Jedward pulled down the back of Amy Childs Bikini bottoms and poured water down them - were not kicked out.

BB6 Makosis duvet was ripped from her by a male exposing her totally nude when she was on her period - Noone kicked out.

[the truth]

Its really hard to imagine how a woman would have felt in daleys position, being kept awake all night with sleep deprivation, having another person jump into his bed against his wishes, invading his boundaries, then demanding physical contact which would endanger ones relationship outside, then pulling her knickers down against their wishes to expose their genitals and also grabbing their throat? I think any woman would be horrified to have suffered this sequence of events, then consider it on live tv to millions....just a shame big brother didn't step in to stop the abuser earlier, then we wuldnt have seen the nasty retaliation.

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by the truth

Its really hard to imagine how a woman would have felt in daleys position, being kept awake all night with sleep deprivation, having another person jump into his bed against his wishes, invading his boundaries, then demanding physical contact which would endanger ones relationship outside, then pulling her knickers down against their wishes to expose their genitals and also grabbing their throat? I think any woman would be horrified to have suffered this sequence of events, then consider it on live tv to millions....just a shame big brother didn't step in to stop the abuser earlier, then we wuldnt have seen the nasty retaliation.

You live on another planet.

Daley could have gone to sleep at any point, Hazel didnt want to go to bed she was outside talking to a friend...Quietly when he came outside and lied about BB telling her she had to go to bed.

Lets be honest he wanted to get his willy wet as we all do but he didn't like that Hazel was being so dominant.

You are making a thread purely based on a 13 minute clip from the highlight show or have been highly manipulated by it.

Anyway yet again you have totally disregarded the facts I posted which answer the question to your thread.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

You live on another planet.

Daley could have gone to sleep at any point, Hazel didnt want to go to bed she was outside talking to a friend...Quietly when he came outside and lied about BB telling her she had to go to bed.

Lets be honest he wanted to get his willy wet as we all do but he didn't like that Hazel was being so dominant.

You are making a thread purely based on a 13 minute clip from the highlight show or have been highly manipulated by it.

Anyway yet again you have totally disregarded the facts I posted which answer the question to your thread.

IF he hasn't answered you ,he's probably got you on ignore

[Eva bee]

The show has evicted a contestant (Daley Ojuderie) for 'aggressive and threatening behaviour' towards Hazel O'Sullivan.
Many viewers are concerned that the show has acted unfairly as they have NOT evicted Hazel for pulling down Daley's underwear, and exposing his genitals to the cameras.
We are concerned that the actions of the program were unfair, sexist and racist! We believe that should Daley had done the same to Hazel he would have not only been removed from the program, but would have most definitely been arrested as well. In any case, if ANY male had done this to ANY female housemate, he would have without a doubt been removed from the program! We cannot understand exactly why Hazel has got away with only a warning. We believe the colour of Daley's skin and his gender has played a great part in all of this. It is the opinion of many that Hazel O'Sullivan should be removed from the program. We are not condoning Daley 's actions, but wholeheartedly believe that they should have BOTH been removed from the program. Both acted irresponsibly, both are at fault, so why was only ONE removed???
IF DALEY HAD DONE THIS TO HAZEL, HE WOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGED WITH SEXUAL ASSAULT!!! HAZEL PUT HER HANDS AROUND DALEY'S THROAT FIRST!!!SHE TORMENTED, TEASED AND PROVOKED HIM! WHY IS SHE GETTING AWAY WITH A 'WARNING'?!
WHY WERE THEY 'CHOSEN' FOR THE SAFE HOUSE???!
WHY, IF SHE WERE 'THREATENED', WERE THEY *ALLOWED TO SPEND ANOTHER NIGHT TOGETHER???!!
WHAT IS THIS REALLY ALL ABOUT CHANNEL 5??? WE NEED ANSWERS

!!!
Sent from my iPad

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by Eva bee

The show has evicted a contestant (Daley Ojuderie) for 'aggressive and threatening behaviour' towards Hazel O'Sullivan.
Many viewers are concerned that the show has acted unfairly as they have NOT evicted Hazel for pulling down Daley's underwear, and exposing his genitals to the cameras.
We are concerned that the actions of the program were unfair, sexist and racist! We believe that should Daley had done the same to Hazel he would have not only been removed from the program, but would have most definitely been arrested as well. In any case, if ANY male had done this to ANY female housemate, he would have without a doubt been removed from the program! We cannot understand exactly why Hazel has got away with only a warning. We believe the colour of Daley's skin and his gender has played a great part in all of this. It is the opinion of many that Hazel O'Sullivan should be removed from the program. We are not condoning Daley 's actions, but wholeheartedly believe that they should have BOTH been removed from the program. Both acted irresponsibly, both are at fault, so why was only ONE removed???
IF DALEY HAD DONE THIS TO HAZEL, HE WOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGED WITH SEXUAL ASSAULT!!! HAZEL PUT HER HANDS AROUND DALEY'S THROAT FIRST!!!SHE TORMENTED, TEASED AND PROVOKED HIM! WHY IS SHE GETTING AWAY WITH A 'WARNING'?!
WHY WERE THEY 'CHOSEN' FOR THE SAFE HOUSE???!
WHY, IF SHE WERE 'THREATENED', WERE THEY *ALLOWED TO SPEND ANOTHER NIGHT TOGETHER???!!
WHAT IS THIS REALLY ALL ABOUT CHANNEL 5??? WE NEED ANSWERS

!!!
Sent from my iPad

No.

[anne666]

Originally Posted by Eva bee

The show has evicted a contestant (Daley Ojuderie) for 'aggressive and threatening behaviour' towards Hazel O'Sullivan.
Many viewers are concerned that the show has acted unfairly as they have NOT evicted Hazel for pulling down Daley's underwear, and exposing his genitals to the cameras.
We are concerned that the actions of the program were unfair, sexist and racist! We believe that should Daley had done the same to Hazel he would have not only been removed from the program, but would have most definitely been arrested as well. In any case, if ANY male had done this to ANY female housemate, he would have without a doubt been removed from the program! We cannot understand exactly why Hazel has got away with only a warning. We believe the colour of Daley's skin and his gender has played a great part in all of this. It is the opinion of many that Hazel O'Sullivan should be removed from the program. We are not condoning Daley 's actions, but wholeheartedly believe that they should have BOTH been removed from the program. Both acted irresponsibly, both are at fault, so why was only ONE removed???
IF DALEY HAD DONE THIS TO HAZEL, HE WOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGED WITH SEXUAL ASSAULT!!! HAZEL PUT HER HANDS AROUND DALEY'S THROAT FIRST!!!SHE TORMENTED, TEASED AND PROVOKED HIM! WHY IS SHE GETTING AWAY WITH A 'WARNING'?!
WHY WERE THEY 'CHOSEN' FOR THE SAFE HOUSE???!
WHY, IF SHE WERE 'THREATENED', WERE THEY *ALLOWED TO SPEND ANOTHER NIGHT TOGETHER???!!
WHAT IS THIS REALLY ALL ABOUT CHANNEL 5??? WE NEED ANSWERS

!!!
Sent from my iPad

Completely disagree. Once again NO-ONE has EVER been removed from the BB for exposing anyone in this way or any other. She was given a formal warning as others have in the past.To play the
race card is a sick joke !!!!!!It is all about BB wanting sleaze as usual and it backfired big time. Did you actually see the live feed, the prelude to all of this? BB put her in danger by not intervening then. They have tried to cover that up by removing the live feed for that night from the you-tube immediately, legal advice probably. I cant bear this woman but objectivity please!!!

[toronto_matt]

Originally Posted by the truth

what would be the consequences?

would BB call him immediately to the diary room?

clearly this is when daley went nuts....BB should have stepped in immediately at that moment to stop the situation getting so out of control

I notice denise welsh did this to the American twins, the twins went nuts about it, yet she got away with it...but if a man invaded a womans boundaries this way and pulled her pants down on live tv, well the reaction would be massive and hed be immediately pulled up , possibly evicted.

double standards. hazel invaded his boundaries big time and BB should have stepped in immediately.

don't quite understand the logic dude. sorry. its not as if hazel and daley had just run into each other on the street for the very first time or something and then hazel pulled his pants down.

pulling pants down in a joking way vs hands around Throat in an aggressive manner. telling someone your going to KILL THEM. don't see the connection..

2 wrongs make a right kinda thing right? is that the logic?

gimmie a break

[amu]

If Hazel was a man and Daley a female only Hazel would have been kicked out. They would then have said that the physical altercation was a reaction to the pulling down etc..

[the truth]

Originally Posted by amu

If Hazel was a man and Daley a female only Hazel would have been kicked out. They would then have said that the physical altercation was a reaction to the pulling down etc..

100% true. we cannt have different rules for men and women. the same rules should apply. BB should have stepped in sooner

[kefln]

Originally Posted by amu

If Hazel was a man and Daley a female only Hazel would have been kicked out. They would then have said that the physical altercation was a reaction to the pulling down etc..

If hazel was a man and daley was a woman, then daley would be the most hated woman in the uk.

Why?

A serial cheat, a parent who lied about her relationship on national tv just to increase thier chances to get into someones pants. Than a women who, when drunk, goes physco and puts a man in a strangle hold and threatens him physically.

Hazel, as a woman, is hated for being single and flirting. Imagine how daley would be perceived if he was female?

There is your double standard.

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by kefln

If hazel was a man and daley was a woman, then daley would be the most hated woman in the uk.

Why?

A serial cheat, a parent who lied about her relationship on national tv just to increase thier chances to get into someones pants. Than a women who, when drunk, goes physco and puts a man in a strangle hold and threatens him physically.

Hazel, as a woman, is hated for being single and flirting. Imagine how daley would be perceived if he was female?

There is your double standard.

I love this post.

[Kizzy]

Kelfin, you have it in a nutshell.....
Not sure why everyone makes out that Katie Hopkins is so socially deluded, it seems half the UK is living in a bygone era when considering the facts of this incident.

[CaudleHalbard]

Half the UK is of below average intelligence!

Think about it!

[kefln]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Half the UK is of below average intelligence!

Think about it!

[the truth]

clearly female housemates are allowed to get away with more, so in that sense the show is 20 years behind the times where males and females are held accountable to the same standards

[kefln]

Originally Posted by the truth

clearly female housemates are allowed to get away with more, so in that sense the show is 20 years behind the times where males and females are held accountable to the same standards

The audience allow females to get away with less. Therefore the viewing public are behind the times in their thinking

[anne666]

Originally Posted by the truth

clearly female housemates are allowed to get away with more, so in that sense the show is 20 years behind the times where males and females are held accountable to the same standards

How long is this going on, once again, she got a formal warning .NO-ONE has EVER been evicted for exposing someone in that way or any other way !!!!

[kefln]

Originally Posted by anne666

How long is this going on, once again, she got a formal warning .NO-ONE has EVER been evicted for exposing someone in that way or any other way !!!!

Its the clutching at straws argument. When someone has little or no real reason for taking sides, apart from personal bais, they focus on one small thing and make it into more than it is.

If they had more, they would say more. Taking this example, had hazel acted like daley, imagine how people would have reacted. Shes called a ***** and a homewrecker as it is.

[anne666]

Originally Posted by kefln

Its the clutching at straws argument. When someone has little or no real reason for taking sides, apart from personal bais, they focus on one small thing and make it into more than it is.

If they had more, they would say more. Taking this example, had hazel acted like daley, imagine how people would have reacted. Shes called a ***** and a homewrecker as it is.

Yes I totally agree. Also I wonder about some peoples English comprehension. No matter how many true facts, both legally and historically are mentioned it never seems to sink in. In some cases we are even seen as Hazel lovers. It is beyond a joke and worrying. I dont like her at all. However that stupid man, whose one brain cell seems to inhabit his penis,only had to tell her to leave him alone from the start of the series.Simple really.Defend that Hazel haters.

[halfacrown]

Originally Posted by anne666

Yes I totally agree. Also I wonder about some peoples English comprehension. No matter how many true facts, both legally and historically are mentioned it never seems to sink in. In some cases we are even seen as Hazel lovers. It is beyond a joke and worrying. I dont like her at all. However that stupid man, whose one brain cell seems to inhabit his penis,only had to tell her to leave him alone from the start of the series.Simple really.Defend that Hazel haters.

Is it not possible to see Hazel's actions as a trigger but not a justification? The OP is saying that if BB had intervened things would not have escalated. Had they been separated, Hazel would have been saved from Daley's rage and aggressive attack. Since Hazel got a warning, why not pull her out immediately? Of course Hazel didn't realise she was with a dangerous person but why were BB so slow to react?

I think that Hazel should have been ejected for exposing Daley, whether or not others have got away with it before. I also think Daley deserved to go because of what he did and until he gets re-education, he will remain a danger.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by kefln

Its the clutching at straws argument. When someone has little or no real reason for taking sides, apart from personal bais, they focus on one small thing and make it into more than it is.

If they had more, they would say more. Taking this example, had hazel acted like daley, imagine how people would have reacted. Shes called a ***** and a homewrecker as it is.

theyre mere words, she is still in the house and will still make a fortune from being a homewrecker and sexually assaulting daley