[Kizzy]

Is it justified?..

'I'll pose a question, in all the years since say... the gulf war started, excluding the twin towers as that was 'evidenced' to be Libya, what direct terrorist incident from extremist Muslims has the US experienced on American soil?'

Therefore what is the evidence to support the executive order?

I posted this in a thread but it wasn't well received and it really does warrant a thread of it's own.

[Northern Monkey]

I think if it's only until the vetting process is sorted out properly then it could possibly be temporarily justified.IF that's what it is.
I'm against his refugee ban though as they can be vetted in the camp before they arrive on US soil and people with green cards should not be turned away as by definition they have already been vetted.So as a whole i'm against Trumps executive order.He's gone a step too far imo.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

I think if it's only until the vetting process is sorted out properly then it could possibly be temporarily justified.IF that's what it is.
I'm against his refugee ban though as they can be vetted in the camp before they arrive on US soil and people with green cards should not be turned away as by definition they have already been vetted.So as a whole i'm against Trumps executive order.He's gone a step too far imo.

This is it, there is no evidence that the system they have atm is not working.

[Crimson Dynamo]

But also to answer the OP

YOu do realise that most of the evidence you ask for will be intelligence and classified?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

But also to answer the OP

YOu do realise that most of the evidence you ask for will be intelligence and classified?

Ok I amended the question.

It would be impossible to men in black stylee erase an attack, except the bowling green massacre obv...

'what direct terrorist incident from extremist Muslims has the US experienced on American soil?'

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Ok I amended the question.

It would be impossible to men in black stylee erase an attack, except the bowling green massacre obv...

'what direct terrorist incident from extremist Muslims has the US experienced on American soil?'

And you know that is why the Executive order was signed how?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

And you know that is why the Executive order was signed how?

I don't... I'm asking what is the justification for an executive order.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I don't... I'm asking what is the justification for an executive order.

I'm genuinely surprised to see there is none so far. I saw this thread earlier and assumed it would be debated for days, but there is little rational input from the other side up to now

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

But also to answer the OP

YOu do realise that most of the evidence you ask for will be intelligence and classified?

Oh bolox to that. Why would Right wing America, the very people who want to manufacture fear of Muslims, hide anything heinous about Muslims? Anti Muslim sentiment has been gathering pace since 9/11 and hate crime has increased at an alarming level.

If you aren't talking about letting in potential terrorists, your moaning about them not being able to adapt to Western ways or how they are trying to take over with Sharia Law or how they marry 13 year old girls. This isn't just about terrorism, its about hate and fear of an entire religion.

What I get, which you seem to have difficulty accepting is, Islamophobia is government policy.

[jennyjuniper]

Why exclude the twin towers? Even if it were Libya behind it. They were still muslim terrorists. Then there is the Boston Marathon massacre. That's only off the top of my head, although I'm sure they will be more. Anyway since isis and other like minded morons keep making threats, it's the potential for terrorist violence that the US and other western countries have to guard against.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by jennyjuniper

Why exclude the twin towers? Even if it were Libya behind it. They were still muslim terrorists. Then there is the Boston Marathon massacre. That's only off the top of my head, although I'm sure they will be more. Anyway since isis and other like minded morons keep making threats, it's the potential for terrorist violence that the US and other western countries have to guard against.

Leader of the 9/11 hijackers was Mohammed Atta, an Egyptian. Egypt is not on the list.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Was an American citizen.

[jennyjuniper]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Leader of the 9/11 hijackers was Mohammed Atta, an Egyptian. Egypt is not on the list.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Was an American citizen.

He is still a muslim terrorist.

[MTVN]

Since when was 9/11 "evidenced to be Libya"

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Since when was 9/11 "evidenced to be Libya"

Sorry I got my planes mixed up I'm thinking of Lockerbie, my mistake, I meant there is said to be evidence against Saudi Arabia, who are not on the list.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by jennyjuniper

He is still a muslim terrorist.

He was a home grown radicalised terrorist, nothing to do with anyone coming into the US with the express intent of terrorism.
He isn't banning all Muslims, so where is the logic?

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Is it justified?..

'I'll pose a question, in all the years since say... the gulf war started, excluding the twin towers as that was 'evidenced' to be Libya, what direct terrorism from extremist Muslims has the US experienced on American soil?'

Therefore what is the evidence to support the executive order?

I posted this in a thread but it wasn't well received and it really does warrant a thread of it's own.

I'm going to turn your question around for a moment Kizzy. I hope you don't mind...

1. What direct terrorism from extreme Western governments have the Iraqi, Libyan, Afghan and Syrian people experienced on their own soil?'

All these anti-Muslim threads certain people keep posting on here are tiresome but the accusations that us lefties are in some way complicit with these Muslim terrorists, is tedious and misguided.

Unfortunately, due to the present hysteria surrounding Islam, it has made sensible criticism of that faith almost impossible. I would love to be able to sensibly criticise certain things about the Muslim faith or sensibly talk about how terrorism could be avoided but instead, I find myself defending Islam because the ignorance surrounding these topics is both ignorant and stupid. I can't talk sensibly about Islam and all the problems with Jihadists and neither can I talk about these things with people who are Islamophobes.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

I'm going to turn your question around for a moment Kizzy. I hope you don't mind...

1. What direct terrorism from extreme Western governments have the Iraqi, Libyan, Afghan and Syrian people experienced on their own soil?'

All these anti-Muslim threads certain people keep posting on here are tiresome but the accusations that us lefties are in some way complicit with these Muslim terrorists, is tedious and misguided.

Unfortunately, due to the present hysteria surrounding Islam, it has made sensible criticism of that faith almost impossible. I would love to be able to sensibly criticise certain things about the Muslim faith or sensibly talk about how terrorism could be avoided but instead, I find myself defending Islam because the ignorance surrounding these topics is both ignorant and stupid. I can't talk sensibly about Islam and all the problems with Jihadists and neither can I talk about these things with people who are Islamophobes.

All these anti-Muslim threads certain people keep posting on here are tiresome but the accusations that us lefties are in some way complicit with these Muslim terrorists, is tedious and misguided.

Can I remind you that it is against forum rules to insult members and secondly

what accusations do you specifically refer to?

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

All these anti-Muslim threads certain people keep posting on here are tiresome but the accusations that us lefties are in some way complicit with these Muslim terrorists, is tedious and misguided.

Can I remind you that it is against forum rules to insult members and secondly

what accusations do you specifically refer to?

I didn't insult anyone directly but if you see yourself in the image I painted and if it makes you feel offended then I'm just going to have to live with that.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

I didn't insult anyone directly but if you see yourself in the image I painted and if it makes you feel offended then I'm just going to have to live with that.

No I am reminding you of forum rules so that people dont report you and you get banned

[user104658]

It's merely the metaphorical extension of his "Wall". Both will cost the US a fortune, neither will increase their national security in any measurable way, so no, it's not justified at all. It's (yet another) popularity grab from a celebrity president that cares (1000x) more about an image that he wants to portray than any sort of usefulness or pragmatism in any of his policies.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Is it justified?..

'I'll pose a question, in all the years since say... the gulf war started, excluding the twin towers as that was 'evidenced' to be Libya, what direct terrorist incident from extremist Muslims has the US experienced on American soil?'

Therefore what is the evidence to support the executive order?

I posted this in a thread but it wasn't well received and it really does warrant a thread of it's own.

Someone mentioned the boston bombing..you swept it to one side rather than address it.... why?

[Beso]

Then you had that muslim soldier who shot up a few people at his american air base.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Someone mentioned the boston bombing..you swept it to one side rather than address it.... why?

.

What don't you get about an executive order to stop Muslims from entering the U.S? The Boston bombing was committed by Muslim Americans and not by people who had cunningly entered the country.

The only way we can curb Islamic extremism in the West is to stop the internet.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

.

The only way we can curb Islamic extremism in the West is to stop the internet.

do it tbh.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

.

What don't you get about an executive order to stop Muslims from entering the U.S? The Boston bombing was committed by Muslim Americans and not by people who had cunningly entered the country.

The only way we can curb Islamic extremism in the West is to stop the internet.

I get it..i'm just answering kizzys question...what don't you get about that?