[Withano]

Originally Posted by Redway

Then I'm done flogging this thing out with you. I don't think pansexuality's a thing and that's that. Peg me down word for word though.

Well thats fine.. its just that others explain why, whilst you’re explanations aren’t to be taken literally, so I’m not sure what conversation you were planning on having.

[Redway]

Originally Posted by Withano

Well thats fine.. its just that others explain why, whilst you’re explanations aren’t to be taken literally, so I’m not sure what conversation you were planning on having.

There's nothing I've said on this thread that other people haven't been hinting at.

Dude here reckons pansexuality's just an ultra-PC version of bisexuality. Come and shoot me.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Redway

There's nothing I've said on this thread that other people haven't been hinting at.

Dude here reckons pansexuality's just an ultra-PC version of bisexuality. Come and shoot me.

...because politically correct people have been known to lie about their sexual interests? Or?

[Redway]

Originally Posted by Withano

...because politically correct people have been known to lie about their sexual interests? Or?

Because transexualism isn't a discrete sexual orientation but gender orientation. Call me old-skool but I do think sexuality tends to one of two directions (hetero or homo-sexual). Everything else either in my eyes has nothing to do with actual sexual orientation (demisexuality) or else just doesn't count as a bona-fide label. As PC and accepting as we get over the decades there's fundamentals of sexuality. Reproduction's one of them.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Redway

Because transexualism isn't a discrete sexual orientation but gender orientation. Call me old-skool but I do think sexuality tends to one of two directions (hetero or homo-sexual). Everything else either in my eyes has nothing to do with actual sexual orientation (demisexuality) or else just doesn't count as a bona-fide label. As PC and accepting as we get over the decades there's fundamentals of sexuality. Reproduction's one of them.

Again, nobody has called transexualism as sexuality. Your understanding of demisexuality is nonsenical too. I’m not convinced you’re even trying.

[Redway]

Originally Posted by Withano

Again, nobody has called transexualism as sexuality. Your understanding of demisexuality is nonsenical too. I’m not convinced you’re even trying.

You would say that though wouldn't you. You're not even trying to understand or accept different opinions.

I don't know if it's that you're deliberately tryna be all black-and-white about this because you can't bear someone mention this pansexuality of a thing as anything other than a bonafide sexuality or you genuinely can't read between the lines.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Redway

You would say that though wouldn't you. You're not even trying to understand or accept different opinions.

You gave me this to work with. Theres opinions which Ive enjoyed discussing on this thread, and then theres just nonsensical messes. I’ll leave it as this, you’re probably inadvertedly doing a better job at convincing the forum that pan could be a thing than I am.

Originally Posted by Redway

Because transexualism isn't a discrete sexual orientation but gender orientation. Call me old-skool but I do think sexuality tends to one of two directions (hetero or homo-sexual). Everything else either in my eyes has nothing to do with actual sexual orientation (demisexuality) or else just doesn't count as a bona-fide label. As PC and accepting as we get over the decades there's fundamentals of sexuality. Reproduction's one of them.

[Redway]

Originally Posted by Withano

You gave me this to work with. Theres opinions which Ive enjoyed discussing on this thread, and then theres just nonsensical messes. I’ll leave it as this, you’re probably inadvertedly doing a better job at convincing the forum that pan could be a thing than I am.

Show me who here's convinced pansexuality's a discrete orientation. Is it the people you've been arguing with on this thread since?

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Redway

Show me who here's convinced pansexuality's a discrete orientation. Is it the people you've been arguing with on this thread since?

Give it a chance, your incoherent thought process has only been up a few seconds.