[Niamh.]

it's 12 weeks unrestricted being proposed in our Referendum which is what the thread is about, just want to prevent some confusion on the issue LT which posts like yours are doing.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

it's 12 weeks unrestricted being proposed in our Referendum which is what the thread is about, just want to prevent some confusion on the issue LT which posts like yours are doing.

I was under the impression that it was 26 weeks until I read your post and there is a gulf of difference between 12 and 26 weeks.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

I was under the impression that it was 26 weeks until I read your post and there is a gulf of difference between 12 and 26 weeks.

It's 12 weeks unrestricted, and later for medical reasons/if the mothers life is in danger etc. There's alot of misinformation being put about, dirty tactics

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

It's 12 weeks unrestricted, and later for medical reasons/if the mothers life is in danger etc. There's alot of misinformation being put about, dirty tactics

I agree about the 'Dirty Tactics', Niamh. I also agree that 'Medical' reasons justify later termination but there are a lot of cases where abortion is definitely used by promiscuous careless women as a 'Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free' card and it is these cases that need greater scrutiny. .

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

I agree about the 'Dirty Tactics', Niamh. I also agree that 'Medical' reasons justify later termination.

I think it's a good proposal as well

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

it's 12 weeks unrestricted being proposed in our Referendum which is what the thread is about, just want to prevent some confusion on the issue LT which posts like yours are doing.

Thanks niamh...12 weeks isnt as bad in my opinion.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Thanks niamh...12 weeks isnt as bad in my opinion.

Yeah I agree, except in medical cases obviously