[Pro Sniper]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

Sis I was THERE for all the shadiness in BB8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 18, and 19 but this season has been soooooo ****ing tame compared to the shenanigans Grodner has pulled in the past. Your "proof" of the show being rigged for Tyler has consisted of, like, a tweet from Rachel about how they edited the first safety comp out of order, a conspiracy theory about an endurance HOH that people were just pissed that Haleigh lost (myself included!), and a bunch of athletic people beating the likes of Sam and JC in timed session Comps. Get back to me when there's shady POV draws, multiple weeks of unfettered safety, and tangible DR manipulation. The *only* shadiness we've had all season is that Tyler was on TKO, which really just proves that production is rooting for him to win because he was almost cast for OTT and won the first HOH Comp early on and it would be easy ****ing storytelling for the mastermind to win out. Everything else though... you're reaching hun.

So, you're prepared to see and acknowledge that the whole narrative was centred around him from the get-go,, yet you can't see/won't acknowledge he's been guided through the game with help and favours, because the level of the rigging hasn't been transparent enough His early (CRUSHING) blind wins were as kosher as the gift of his 2 month safety net? His crawling up the ass of silly Sam(who was conveniently gifted the other safety net, a pathetic nonentity who was clearly in there for the sole purpose of giving him a head start in jury votes(Raven for Paul), was just "luck" or "good gameplay"?) The cheating of an HOH win(quite unreal that an obvious rule break is seen as a "conspiracy theory") was just an oversight by those running the game? Fessy willingly targets his own alliance members(at a critical point in the game) over Level FIX? The sole f-2 deal he made from the off that had any realness to it, happens to make up the other half who specialise in blind comp wins?(not all of which were "athletic") Yes, it's all just "luck", "coincidence" and of course "brilliant gameplay" that's accounted for all that's went in his favour..

I find it quite strange that someone who acknowledges the show has been involved in heavy riggage, is unwilling to admit that this is just more of the same. Maybe the problem is you're judging it against previous rigging which was much more "obvious" to you.

While none of us will ever have any concrete "proof" of their obvious underhanded filth, is it really unreasonable or "far-fetched" that after watching a familiar, sickening, production themed narrative be rammed down our throats, to believe it's highly plausible they'd use these blind spots to take the easy opportunity of crediting a win where it's "needed"?

What's the worst part of this game for the fans, but best for production? Without a doubt the answer is blind comps. An area where we as fans must trust them to play fair and act with honesty and integrity. Please forgive me for not having faith in the well known lying, rigging, cheating scumbag bastards.