 |
Beso | Piss orf.
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: scotland
Posts: 49,005
Favourites:
|
|
|
Beso | Piss orf.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: scotland
Posts: 49,005
Favourites:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy
So you can't name one which proves my point.
The principle doesn't hold up, the argument is that, by nominating the short film for an oscar, it's going to get a lot of attention and benefit the director but that's not the case. The short film award rarely gets attention and the people who make them don't go on to achieve success purely for it.
There's no such thing as bad publicity in situations, the only thing she's achieved in doing now is getting a lot more people to watch the film then they would have if she didn't say anything. If anything, her actions are probably gonna benefit the film's chances because now there's a narrative going on in an award that nobody pays attention to and the academy loves a good award narrative.
She could have done more damage to the film by staying silent. All she's achieved by speaking out is increase it's chances of winning.
|
https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.mic.c...mous-directors
|