Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 25-01-2019, 04:01 PM #7
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew. View Post
Why should he be protected though, especially as he’s gone on to commit more crimes since. Even just hearing the name “Jon Venables” sends shivers down my spine
It doesn't really matter if he should or shouldn't be protected, though...if it's illegal to share the pictures it's illegal. That said, I would have thought you would only be able to be charged with something if it could either be proved that you knew it was illegal to share them, or if you refused to remove them when told to.

It's surely unrealistic to expect everyone to be aware of every individual whose photographs can't be shared .
user104658 is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
bit, malone, porridge, tina


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts