Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
I'd say its partly hypocritical but not entirely... I mean... That original Katie and Peter show was trash but they were generally pretty together at the time and while I don't necessarily agree with little kids being in the limelight like that myself, it didn't come across too badly.
Katie Price at the moment though... Is by all accounts a bit of a train wreck. So even if he would be OK with the kids being on TV generally, I can totally understand not being OK with them being in any upcoming show she has at the moment.
I guess I'd also say it's not necessarily hypocritical for him to have been OK with the earlier show and not OK with it now... People are allowed to reflect on things and feel differently about them... He may well regret having them on that show. It would only be hypocrisy if he was refusing to let them go on her show, but then wanted to do a show himself and have them appear on that.
I guess a bit like Matt Lucas; he expresses regret over a lot of the "Little Britain" sketches and says he wishes they hadn't done some of them and that he wouldn't do it now. I wouldn't call it hypocrisy... Just a change in perspective.
|
yes good points but I suppose it's different from Matt Lucas in the way that it was something he'd done then looked back and said he regrets some of them where as you could be a bit more cynical when it comes to Peter because it's a situation of he was fine with it when he was involved but now he isn't when he's not involved?
Either way it's a good decision right now for those kids I think and I do think they're luckier then the rest of Katies kids because Peter seems like a stable influence on them