[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Where did I say this?

We can debate all day how weird Jackson is, his behaviour, his family, his entire life and him toying with the lives of these children and their families. I for one find the entire notion of these families practically selling their kids in the hopes of fame and fortune abhorrent.

But, again, that's not evidence of pedophilia.

A paedophile is.someone who has urges towards pre-pubescent children, whether they act upon those urges or leave them as fantasies....whether any contact has happened or not, the evidence of naked pictures is evidence of some level.of peado behaviour, I don't have naked pics of my kid at this age as he would be mortified and neither do any of my friends with kids over the age of 2-3 so why would he have pictures of naked, semi naked kids that were.not related if not for some gratification???