Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicky.
Surely this line of thinking though, accepts that they led when they testified in his favour? which means basically, when asked if he ever touched them and they said no, that was a lie and he did.
So yeah I guess you could deduct from that that they might embellish or whatever now to sensationalise it or whatever. But, it still relies on admitting they lied in the first place, and Wade was one of the major reasons he got off (though I really dont get that..as I said earlier...not abusing every kid does not mean you abused none).
|
I'm with Judge Judy on this one. If you get caught lying once, I'm always going to assume you're not being wholly truthful.
Threaded Mode