[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Has anyone changed their stance one way or the other since watching?

I have drifted much further towards guilty. But not changed my view as such. Done a fair bit of reading..including all the fansites that go into huge details about how every single person who said anything negative was an extortionist or a thief and whatnot too. The odd person, sure. So many? Nope.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I have drifted much further towards guilty. But not changed my view as such. Done a fair bit of reading..including all the fansites that go into huge details about how every single person who said anything negative was an extortionist or a thief and whatnot too. The odd person, sure. So many? Nope.

I heard some guy on a radio phone in this morning say he was 100 per cent sure he was guilty until he watched it and now he thinks they are doing it for cynical reasons, I don't the we will ever get the truth either way

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I heard some guy on a radio phone in this morning say he was 100 per cent sure he was guilty until he watched it and now he thinks they are doing it for cynical reasons, I don't the we will ever get the truth either way

I don't understand this at all?

OK I get that some simply dont believe the guys, thats up to them.

However, how could anyone think he was guilty, then watch 2 more people tell their story and suddenly think him innocent? what was it that made them think he was guilty before, and why would the program switch that? Genuinely trying to understand it but makes no sense to me!

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I don't understand this at all?

OK I get that some simply dont believe the guys, thats up to them.

However, how could anyone think he was guilty, then watch 2 more people tell their story and suddenly think him innocent? what was it that made them think he was guilty before, and why would the program switch that? Genuinely trying to understand it but makes no sense to me!

it makes no sense and i dont buy it as truth

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I don't understand this at all?

OK I get that some simply dont believe the guys, thats up to them.

However, how could anyone think he was guilty, then watch 2 more people tell their story and suddenly think him innocent? what was it that made them think he was guilty before, and why would the program switch that? Genuinely trying to understand it but makes no sense to me!

Quite a few people ringing in felt the documentary was one sided and dramatised for effect, of course there was a balance of views but that one stood out for me

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Quite a few people ringing in felt the documentary was one sided and dramatised for effect, of course there was a balance of views but that one stood out for me

of course it was one sided that was what it was about

about the side of the victims

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Quite a few people ringing in felt the documentary was one sided and dramatised for effect, of course there was a balance of views but that one stood out for me

Well yes, that makes sense.

But saying that because a biased documentary was made, you suddenly think he is innocent rather than guilty is plain, bizarre and makes no sense?

I believe the Royal family had a hand in Dianas death. If a documentary came out tomorrow, of a friend of the family saying that they overheard conversations discussing how best to get rid of Diana and I disbelieved this person that they heard such a conversation and thought the documantery was biased...I don't see why this would make me think suddenly the total opposite? If that makes any sense, probably not explaining myself well at all