[GoldHeart]

Didn't Wade's wife claim she didn't have any knowledge of sexual abuse yet they've both set up a charity page to help victims as she's a survivor of abuse . Yet said she had no experience of abuse .

The charity page asking for donations sounds like a scam

[user104658]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

I'm not an idiot I understand all that but it doesn't fit with James & Wade's stories

I'm not going to believe 2 well known pathological liars ! , its as simply as that . plus if they've lived under oath what makes you think suddenly they're telling the truth??? I can't understand that.

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Didn't Wade's wife claim she didn't have any knowledge of sexual abuse yet they've both set up a charity page to help victims as she's a survivor of abuse . Yet said she had no experience of abuse .

The charity page asking for donations sounds like a scam

They're "pathological" liars and the charity is probably "a scam"? Your reaching is getting more and more desperate, here, surely. Do you even actually know what the term "pathological liar" means?

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

They're "pathological" liars and the charity is probably "a scam"? Your reaching is getting more and more desperate, here, surely. Do you even actually know what the term "pathological liar" means?

I'm "desperate" ???
Pretty sure safechuck , Robson & Reed are the desperate ones but OK

[GoldHeart]

His bedroom was the size of an apartment complex. It's not your average bedroom , families have slept there.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

His bedroom was the size of an apartment complex. It's not your average bedroom , families have slept there.

One could say the size of scrooges layer, just more comfortable..

What if...there is a paedophile ring/or was.

Michael at the head to begin with, he grooms and trains these five kids who all seem to be in all photos...they then become the paedophille ring, the abused kids selecting kids for michael scrooge to abuse...

[user104658]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

His bedroom was the size of an apartment complex. It's not your average bedroom , families have slept there.

Is that a defense though, or does it make it even stranger that he shared a bed with kids? As you say his bedroom had multiple beds in it, it even reportedly had an entirely separate little sleeping area up some stairs, so if you believe it's just that they all partied in his room watching films etc. then fell asleep... why would it involve sharing a bed? I can understand the argument that he had a childlike nature, I can understand the suggestion that it was innocent, but to believe that he didn't think twice about sharing a bed - EVEN if his intentions were innocent... especially after the first accusation... you have to believe that he was not just childlike but also incredibly stupid. And I don't believe that he was stupid. So I have to assume that continuing with sharing beds after the first allegation was not because he thought it was OK - he by then KNEW FOR A FACT that it wasn't seen as being OK - so it can only realistically have been down to compulsion which suggests ulterior motive. Honestly either he was compelled to sleep with children, or he's innocent but he wasn't just "odd" - he was completely off-the-rails insane.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

His bedroom was the size of an apartment complex. It's not your average bedroom , families have slept there.

They slept in the same bed....the size of the room is irrelevant.