Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 14-05-2019, 10:36 PM #4
Ant. Ant. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 17,838

Favourites (more):
CBB17: Tiffany Pollard
CBB16: Natasha Hamilton


Ant. Ant. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 17,838

Favourites (more):
CBB17: Tiffany Pollard
CBB16: Natasha Hamilton


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicky. View Post
Guessing this was prompted by my post in the Arthur thread?

I would say maybe early teens, but not as in, positions or anything ( ) but like, how to do it safely. Same as how I think vaginal sex should be 'taught' really.

Random thing I learnt recently about sex ed..seems theres actually a bit of a push on right now for teachers to focus more on the 'pleasure' side of things when doing sex ed in general. I know some seem to think this is the 'progressive' way to go, but honestly it makes me feel a bit ill. And I think any teacher who would be happy with doing a sex ed lesson with, say 14 year olds and being willing to tell them what positions to try and tell them what you find pleasurable and stuff..should be nowhere ****ing near any classroom.

Of course pleasure is an important part of (good) sex however, I do not think its appopriate at all to go into stuff like that with underage people. Prudish of me, maybe but..ugh no.
That must be very recent, I think I finished looking at Sex Ed 4 years ago and we didn't talk about how sex could be enjoyable. I agree with you completely, I don't think it's necessary, and I really don't think it's appropriate to detail it in such a way. Saying "it should be enjoyable" is good! But to discuss positions is... wow

(Bearing in mind I went to a Catholic school, so if it has been something introduced in the past few years I wouldn't put it past me for mine to completely omit it)

On that note, I remember I was thinking "uhm are you allowed to do that?" when my friend wrote about anal sex (which we weren't taught) in his sex ed essay

I wonder what the curriculum is for sex ed in non-Catholic schools. Our sex ed was split across Biology (we did a few lessons on it in Year 7) and then everything else (ethics, STIs, consent, law, etc) in Religious Studies (and of course, Christian attitudes to contraception). And even then I don't remember any sex ed from Year 7 Biology, just most the class in uproar because the teacher said "penis" and she said "it's okay I'll let you all laugh about it for a minute".
I really think I/we should've been taught about anal sex when contraception came up. We barely even talked about how condoms help prevent the transmission of STIs because our teacher was so religious she was against talking about and encouraging artificial contraception there does seem to be a myth still that gay people can just, not use a condom because they can't get pregnant, and it would've helped if they sat with us and said, "use one. You will probably get STIs without them")
Ant. is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
age, anal, kids, sex, taught


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts