[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Smithy

Just for clarification, you can’t nominate yourself as somebody has just tried to

Sorry but I will still always prefer most hated and am gutted we aren't allowed it. This puts me off ML because..well I prefer reading peoples 'real' opinions on me than them trying to be as nice as possible. much much funnier, though I do get why its banned when we are trying to get rid of negativity..didn't really see it as negative though as..while a few members were actually hated most likely, most just used it as a way to get in random snipes. Plus, am more likely to place in most hated :L

IIRC smithys reasons were ****ing amazing too, proper paragraphs

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Sorry but I will still always prefer most hated and am gutted we aren't allowed it. This puts me off ML because..well I prefer reading peoples 'real' opinions on me than them trying to be as nice as possible. much much funnier, though I do get why its banned when we are trying to get rid of negativity..didn't really see it as negative though as..while a few members were actually hated most likely, most just used it as a way to get in random snipes. Plus, am more likely to place in most hated :L

IIRC smithys reasons were ****ing amazing too, proper paragraphs

Ugh, the utter VENOM I'd spew now if it was still a thing

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Ugh, the utter VENOM I'd spew now if it was still a thing

Ha, I can imagine!

Its another thing that basically tends to cause a huge blowout argument, then everything seems quite calm for a bit afterwards. Like when we let one of those argument threads just run and run. Its good for the forum I think, to get it all out every now and again..fairly sure James disagrees though..

[Calderyon]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Ha, I can imagine!

Its another thing that basically tends to cause a huge blowout argument, then everything seems quite calm for a bit afterwards. Like when we let one of those argument threads just run and run. Its good for the forum I think, to get it all out every now and again..fairly sure James disagrees though..

It would just lead to a record number of bans & infractions. And probably awkwardness.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Calderyon

It would just lead to a record number of bans & infractions. And probably awkwardness.

Might be misremembering this but..I think we did away with infractions for that thread? Or would certainly have not treat it the same as other threads.

Like the big blowout argument threads we allow, generally we just don't mod them unless something seriously bad is said, else half the forum would be banned and..whats the point in allowing people to blow off steam then infracting them for it really..

Admin never seem to impressed when we have purposely let an argument run though in the hope people get it all out of their system. And sometimes, it doesnt work and just gets dragged to other threads. Sometimes..it does make a bit of calm for a bit though.

[Calderyon]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Might be misremembering this but..I think we did away with infractions for that thread? Or would certainly have not treat it the same as other threads.

Like the big blowout argument threads we allow, generally we just don't mod them unless something seriously bad is said, else half the forum would be banned and..whats the point in allowing people to blow off steam then infracting them for it really..

Admin never seem to impressed when we have purposely let an argument run though in the hope people get it all out of their system. And sometimes, it doesnt work and just gets dragged to other threads. Sometimes..it does make a bit of calm for a bit though.

A roast thread would be a better thing. The roast participant would have to volunteer themselves and give people permission to do that obviously.

[caprimint]

Originally Posted by Calderyon

A roast thread would be a better thing. The roast participant would have to volunteer themselves and give people permission to do that obviously.

People can opt out (obviously) of controversy too though, it's the same difference

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Calderyon

A roast thread would be a better thing. The roast participant would have to volunteer themselves and give people permission to do that obviously.

...like instead of the Hot-seat, the Roast-Seat....?...

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Might be misremembering this but..I think we did away with infractions for that thread? Or would certainly have not treat it the same as other threads.

Like the big blowout argument threads we allow, generally we just don't mod them unless something seriously bad is said, else half the forum would be banned and..whats the point in allowing people to blow off steam then infracting them for it really..

Admin never seem to impressed when we have purposely let an argument run though in the hope people get it all out of their system. And sometimes, it doesnt work and just gets dragged to other threads. Sometimes..it does make a bit of calm for a bit though.

I always found after a huge argument the forum would calm down for a while

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Calderyon

A roast thread would be a better thing. The roast participant would have to volunteer themselves and give people permission to do that obviously.

Hmm maybe, most hated was just like a giant roast anyway though. Singular at a time might work much better while we have less active users..not sure admin would go for it though

Originally Posted by Smithy

I always found after a huge argument the forum would calm down for a while

Usually this happens. A few times it has not. Still think its massively beneficial from time to time.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Might be misremembering this but..I think we did away with infractions for that thread? Or would certainly have not treat it the same as other threads.

Like the big blowout argument threads we allow, generally we just don't mod them unless something seriously bad is said, else half the forum would be banned and..whats the point in allowing people to blow off steam then infracting them for it really..

Admin never seem to impressed when we have purposely let an argument run though in the hope people get it all out of their system. And sometimes, it doesnt work and just gets dragged to other threads. Sometimes..it does make a bit of calm for a bit though.

Admin rarely make good decisions... Such as a swear filter (with a bunch of non-swear words added to it) for a TV show that featured a woman masturbating with a wine bottle in the garden. The fear of banning people (unless they just so happen not to like them) is another problematic aspect.

[caprimint]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Ha, I can imagine!

Its another thing that basically tends to cause a huge blowout argument, then everything seems quite calm for a bit afterwards. Like when we let one of those argument threads just run and run. Its good for the forum I think, to get it all out every now and again..fairly sure James disagrees though..

I think really that it just gives everybody a chance to say everything, so potentially after there's more ~tension because then people have to go back to being 'civilised' but then it could go the opposite way as well.

I dunno, but it was really entertaining last time And tbf the forum would probably come ALIVE then, I'd say it doesn't matter much anyway now BB is over.