Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 24-07-2019, 09:51 AM #11
ChristmasNeeve's Avatar
ChristmasNeeve ChristmasNeeve is offline
Niamh | Hands off my Brick!
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ireland-The peoples Republic of Cork!
Posts: 149,882

Favourites (more):
BB19: Cian
IAC2018: Rita Simons


ChristmasNeeve ChristmasNeeve is offline
Niamh | Hands off my Brick!
ChristmasNeeve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ireland-The peoples Republic of Cork!
Posts: 149,882

Favourites (more):
BB19: Cian
IAC2018: Rita Simons


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
Why is it flimsy? It's pointing out that extreme examples are not a good benchmark for advocating sweeping change.

But sweeping change is what's been asked for (and his been done on the quiet in some countries) for the benefit of a small minority at the risk of a majority but that's ok with you? (why wouldn't it be I guess, it's never going to actually effect your rights in any real way, is it?)


We could take asylum seekers as another example, then. Have people abused the asylum system to enter nations with malicious intent? Yes, there are obvious and clear examples of this happening. And people have been hurt and killed. There are many, MANY people who would use this - the fact that there are dangerous individuals willing to exploit the asylum system - as evidence that we must "rethink the system". And who would argue that anyone who disagrees "doesn't clearly doesn't care about the victims or potential victims of those people". Is a traitor or unpatriotic.


It is a direct comparison. It is more or less exactly the same thing.

Do I think that extreme examples of violent individuals gaining access to countries full of people they want to attack is a problem? Obviously, yes I do. Do I think it means we need to halt, reconsider, or have a sweeping overhaul of the asylum system? No absolutely not.

So why would I think that we need a sweeping overhaul of trans rights for the same reason? I'm not willing to be that sort of hypocrite.
Rethink the system? You're talking like Self IDing has always been a thing and not the other way round? The re thinking the system happened the opposite way round to what you're claiming TS, it's all sounding like double think now. Womens rights to sex segregated areas and sports and now apparently the right to refuse to touch a strangers penis are the rights that have been taken away without pretty much any consultation or discussion, it's been done so quietly and under the carpet that I'm willing to bet a vast majority of the general public don't even know Self IDing happened at all or even what it is.
.
__________________

Spoiler:



Quote:
Originally Posted by GiRTh View Post
You compare Jim Davidson to Nelson Mandela?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesus. View Post
I know, how stupid? He's more like Gandhi.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaiah 7:14 View Post



Katie Hopkins reveals epilepsy made her suicidal - and says she identifies as a MAN
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
Just because she is a giant cock, doesn't make her a man.

Last edited by ChristmasNeeve; 24-07-2019 at 09:53 AM.
ChristmasNeeve is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
attempting, canadian, coerce, legally, man, scrotum, wax, women


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts