[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

Nobody is silencing anybody.
Social media platforms are private companies and have no obligation to host everybody.

Electric companies are private companies and have no obligation to provide for everybody. Should they get to deny people services?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Electric companies are private companies and have no obligation to provide for everybody. Should they get to deny people services?

You're comparing an electric company refusing service due to... not liking someone to... someone being banned from a privately owned website for breaking the website's own rules?

Your comparison does not work.

It's like exclaiming that TiBB does not have the right to deny people the ability to post.

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Electric companies are private companies and have no obligation to provide for everybody. Should they get to deny people services?

Yes, if they break conditions of service, like fascists, racists and white supremacists do.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Electric companies are private companies and have no obligation to provide for everybody. Should they get to deny people services?

You're trying to compare social media websites to power companies. Power companies don't give platforms to people to misuse, social media can. It's just... a really badly thought out comparison on your part that makes little sense and relies entirely on false equivalency to work.

Right wing people keep getting banned from social media because they break the ****ing rules. You aren't arguing that they are being treated unfairly, you're arguing that they should get special treatment and be exempt from the rules.