[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

No. I expect either a new referendum to discuss no deal, or we leave with a deal. It's not that complicated considering ND was project fear first time around, and now you're all claiming it's what you wanted all along.

So you want a referendum with the question "no deal on the table yes or no" is that right?

What if the result came back as, keep no deal on the table. And then we can only negotiate a bad deal, which is what we've done so far. Would you then say "no deal" must be implemented?