Quote:
Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper
I have no idea. On the face of it it sounds ridiculous, but experts (not me) are saying we're on the precipice of catastrophe, so aiming for 2 billion and hitting 1.5 billion (as an example) seems like an ambitious target and something to aim for. You know full well whatever the target is we won't hit it, so go for the bigger number and see what happens.
I don't think mocking ambition when it comes to the climate is the right approach, but unfortunately climate change seems to have become weirdly political for some strange reason.
|
it has been politicised by the far left and not so far left and that is one legacy they will live (or not) to regret
Threaded Mode