[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

if it escalates into a proper war with the USA against Iran then the NATO countries are duty bound to come to the assistance of the USA. That is the whole point about NATO. People really should be more aware of the world they live in

and then what, putting themselves into danger


and as for that last sentence, i am aware of what world we live in, also Trump is in the wrong here

like i earlier stated, you should Always try to negotiate at a neutral location first of all, and only kill a major military official as a last resort, and i mean Trump's ''negotiating'' with the both korea's was a by the media called success so what is the difference here then


since North Korea also was a same (or even worse) nuclear threat towards the US, and now also a threat possibly when Kim had stated they are working on new strategic weapons

[bots]

Originally Posted by Nicky91

and then what, putting themselves into danger


and as for that last sentence, i am aware of what world we live in, also Trump is in the wrong here

like i earlier stated, you should Always try to negotiate at a neutral location first of all, and only kill a major military official as a last resort, and i mean Trump's ''negotiating'' with the both korea's was a by the media called success so what is the difference here then


since North Korea also was a same (or even worse) nuclear threat towards the US, and now also a threat possibly when Kim had stated they are working on new strategic weapons

with respect Nicky, there is not a chance in hell that any western country is going to side with Iran over the USA in a war. Of course nobody wants a war. The USA and Iran don't want a war either, but these things happen. For years, Iran has committed terrorist atrocities against the west. They are becoming more and more active, something had to be done and taking out a terrorist general seems like a reasonable step to me.

[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

with respect Nicky, there is not a chance in hell that any western country is going to side with Iran over the USA in a war. Of course nobody wants a war. The USA and Iran don't want a war either, but these things happen. For years, Iran has committed terrorist atrocities against the west. They are becoming more and more active, something had to be done and taking out a terrorist general seems like a reasonable step to me.

Iran does not want a war, they now just want justice served to those who killed their general


also your statement of ''terrorist general'' makes no sense, since he in recent years fought against ISIL terrorists, extremists in smaller Iraqi cities

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Nicky91

Iran does not want a war, they now just want justice served to those who killed their general


also your statement of ''terrorist general'' makes no sense, since he in recent years fought against ISIL terrorists, extremists in smaller Iraqi cities

According to US intelligence he was plotting (another) imminent attack on US citizens. What do you want the US to do.

If Dutch intelligence knew that this man was about to kill 1000 people in your town what would you want done....nothing?

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

According to US intelligence he was plotting (another) imminent attack on US citizens. What do you want the US to do.

If Dutch intelligence knew that this man was about to kill 1000 people in your town what would you want done....nothing?

According to US intelligence, Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and we know how that turned out.

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

According to US intelligence, Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and we know how that turned out.

That was Corrupt New Labour Blair
and USA GW Bush.


Not the same staff now
silly

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

That was Corrupt New Labour Blair
and USA GW Bush.


Not the same staff now
silly

The US has been pulling the same stunt for over a century.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

According to US intelligence, Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and we know how that turned out.

how did it tiurn out as it was your labour party who was in charge of the UK?

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

how did it tiurn out as it was your labour party who was in charge of the UK?

You think your conservative party wouldn't have followed the same path when only 2 voted against it and 146 for it? That's cute.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Nicky91

Iran does not want a war, they now just want justice served to those who killed their general


also your statement of ''terrorist general'' makes no sense, since he in recent years fought against ISIL terrorists, extremists in smaller Iraqi cities

Terrorists can dislike and attack other terrorists, that's why there's so much turmoil in the middle east...