[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

with respect Nicky, there is not a chance in hell that any western country is going to side with Iran over the USA in a war. Of course nobody wants a war. The USA and Iran don't want a war either, but these things happen. For years, Iran has committed terrorist atrocities against the west. They are becoming more and more active, something had to be done and taking out a terrorist general seems like a reasonable step to me.

Iran does not want a war, they now just want justice served to those who killed their general


also your statement of ''terrorist general'' makes no sense, since he in recent years fought against ISIL terrorists, extremists in smaller Iraqi cities

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Nicky91

Iran does not want a war, they now just want justice served to those who killed their general


also your statement of ''terrorist general'' makes no sense, since he in recent years fought against ISIL terrorists, extremists in smaller Iraqi cities

According to US intelligence he was plotting (another) imminent attack on US citizens. What do you want the US to do.

If Dutch intelligence knew that this man was about to kill 1000 people in your town what would you want done....nothing?

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

According to US intelligence he was plotting (another) imminent attack on US citizens. What do you want the US to do.

If Dutch intelligence knew that this man was about to kill 1000 people in your town what would you want done....nothing?

According to US intelligence, Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and we know how that turned out.

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

According to US intelligence, Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and we know how that turned out.

That was Corrupt New Labour Blair
and USA GW Bush.


Not the same staff now
silly

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

That was Corrupt New Labour Blair
and USA GW Bush.


Not the same staff now
silly

The US has been pulling the same stunt for over a century.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

According to US intelligence, Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and we know how that turned out.

how did it tiurn out as it was your labour party who was in charge of the UK?

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

how did it tiurn out as it was your labour party who was in charge of the UK?

You think your conservative party wouldn't have followed the same path when only 2 voted against it and 146 for it? That's cute.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

You think your conservative party wouldn't have followed the same path when only 2 voted against it and 146 for it? That's cute.

they were not in power and the PM was labour person Tony Blair

not a great time for the labour party tbh and this is their legacy

that isnt cute, its real and dangerous

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Nicky91

Iran does not want a war, they now just want justice served to those who killed their general


also your statement of ''terrorist general'' makes no sense, since he in recent years fought against ISIL terrorists, extremists in smaller Iraqi cities

Terrorists can dislike and attack other terrorists, that's why there's so much turmoil in the middle east...