[Tom4784]

Idiot doesn't know what she's talking about. Sex is biological, gender is sociological.

Originally Posted by Alf

The worrying thing is, people actually took the time to go to the polling station and vote for her to represent them.

I'd be more worried about the millions of people who have lived through ten years of Tory leadership, of harsh cuts to vital services and financial difficulties just to vote for a government led by a known moron just because they want to believe the fairy tales he spouts over the reality of what the past ten years of Tory leadership has done to the country.

Voting for some idiot that can't even tell the difference between sex and gender probably isn't as bad then people going back to the party that hurts them repeatedly just to beg for more.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Idiot doesn't know what she's talking about. Sex is biological, gender is sociological.







I'd be more worried about the millions of people who have lived through ten years of Tory leadership, of harsh cuts to vital services and financial difficulties just to vote for a government led by a known moron just because they want to believe the fairy tales he spouts over the reality of what the past ten years of Tory leadership has done to the country.



Voting for some idiot that can't even tell the difference between sex and gender probably isn't as bad then people going back to the party that hurts them repeatedly just to beg for more.

I hate politics/politicians but Labour are no better / different than the Conservatives imho

We’ve experienced many turbulent times with them both supposedly governing the country.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Zizu

I hate politics/politicians but Labour are no better / different than the Conservatives imho

We’ve experienced many turbulent times with them both supposedly governing the country.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

That's a very nothing point to make. We've had the Tories for a ten year stint now and, yes, the Blair era was terrible (but he was also basically a Tory in red so go figure) but to use that as an argument to defend the tories when we've had a decade of **** from them is centrism at it's worst. Both Milliband and Corbyn were very different to Brown and Blair and the new candidates are too, you can't really compare the present to a past era and it's members that have largely lost influence since then.

At the end of the day, people voted for their Tory shackles yet aga9j, that's all that matters.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

That's a very nothing point to make. We've had the Tories for a ten year stint now and, yes, the Blair era was terrible (but he was also basically a Tory in red so go figure) but to use that as an argument to defend the tories when we've had a decade of **** from them is centrism at it's worst. Both Milliband and Corbyn were very different to Brown and Blair and the new candidates are too, you can't really compare the present to a past era and it's members that have largely lost influence since then.



At the end of the day, people voted for their Tory shackles yet aga9j, that's all that matters.

Well I’ve lived through some horrendous times ... I was a youngster when Harold Wilson took charge the first time ... his main ‘achievement’ was to abolish capital punishment something I wonder about nowadays.. these terrorists certainly wouldn’t be being released early and going onto kill innocent people if we had that option open to us ..

He did have something in common with Corbyn though .. people didn’t trust Wilson - not even the Royal family who feared he was a Russian agent .. he seemed to associate with some odd people ( like Corbyn) and was thought by some to be in with the Russian KGB !





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro