[Marsh.]

What WOULD we do without her.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by jet

Lovely pic. Thank goodness for Wills and Kate, great assets to the Royal family.

The whole country agrees

[Glenn.]

As a future king and queen of our country they have no choice but to be assets.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

The Effortless style as Wills and Kate meet the Irish First Lady and magician Paul Daniels

The first lady saying."and his cock looks just like him"

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

"On duty" = drinking Guinness and shaking people's hands.

LT does that every day, where are his millions?

Perks of the job...

[jet]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

As a future king and queen of our country they have no choice but to be assets.

Lucky they are genuine assets then - imagine the disaster if Harry had been the first born.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Perks of the job...

Not so much perks as the job itself.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by jet

Lucky they are genuine assets then - imagine the disaster if Harry had been the first born.

Then he would have been tied to the crown. Luckily he wasn’t and has had the chance to break away from a tired establishment

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Not so much perks as the job itself.

Showing again you don't understand the role of the Royal family. Google it .
If that was the job itself Meghan wouldn't have scuttled off, too fragile to cope.
Poor lamb.

[jet]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ton-visit.html

Irish newspapers praise Prince William and Kate Middleton for message of 'peace and reconciliation' during tour - while columnist compares their visit to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's 'chaotic' trip two years ago.

A report in the Irish Daily Mail from Craig Hughes said a 'message of peace and reconciliation rang out throughout the opening day' of the official visit.

And Irish Times journalist Miriam Lord said William and Kate were launching a 'charm offensive' during their three-day tour, nine years after the Queen's visit.

The political sketch writer added that it appeared the Cambridges 'were well briefed on the political situation in Ireland in a non-partisan way'.

Meanwhile the Independent's editorial said the visit 'should be appreciated, after 800 years of shared history with UK we should take nothing for granted'.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

Showing again you don't understand the role of the Royal family. Google it .
If that was the job itself Meghan wouldn't have scuttled off, too fragile to cope.
Poor lamb.

You didn't understand my post at all did you?

No, better to provoke and disparage.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ton-visit.html

Irish newspapers praise Prince William and Kate Middleton for message of 'peace and reconciliation' during tour - while columnist compares their visit to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's 'chaotic' trip two years ago.

A report in the Irish Daily Mail from Craig Hughes said a 'message of peace and reconciliation rang out throughout the opening day' of the official visit.

And Irish Times journalist Miriam Lord said William and Kate were launching a 'charm offensive' during their three-day tour, nine years after the Queen's visit.

The political sketch writer added that it appeared the Cambridges 'were well briefed on the political situation in Ireland in a non-partisan way'.

Meanwhile the Independent's editorial said the visit 'should be appreciated, after 800 years of shared history with UK we should take nothing for granted'.

The Daily Mail is agenda-driven.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

The Daily Mail is agenda-driven.

It was Irish Independent executive editor Caitlin McBride who made the comment about M&H. The Daily Mail reported what she said.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

It was Irish Independent executive editor Caitlin McBride who made the comment about M&H. The Daily Mail reported what she said.

The article contains a lot more than a "comment". My comment pertains to the article.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

The article contains a lot more than a "comment". My comment pertains to the article.

Why then did you highlight the part mentioning the comment about H&M. Come on.

What agenda do you think the DM had in that article? That the Irish newspapers were not praising the Cambridge's visit, it was lies? Or if not, what exactly?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

Why then did you highlight the part mentioning the comment about H&M. Come on.

What agenda do you think the DM had in that article? That the Irish newspapers were not praising the Cambridge's visit, it was lies? Or if not, what exactly?

I didn't highlight it. It's highlighted in your original post. "Come on"

Agenda? To tear strips off Harry and his family and act as though rainbows and teddy bears fly out of Kate's backside. As with every article on the matter.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I didn't highlight it. It's highlighted in your original post. "Come on"

Agenda? To tear strips off Harry and his family and act as though rainbows and teddy bears fly out of Kate's backside. As with every article on the matter.

Where in that DM quote I posted were they tearing strips off Harry and his family?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

Where in that DM quote I posted were they tearing strips off Harry and his family?

I never said they did. You asked me what their agenda was.

The article feeds into the Saint Kate narrative.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I never said they did. You asked me what their agenda was.

The article feeds into the Saint Kate narrative.

Agenda? To tear strips off Harry and his family

Here it is, plain as day.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

Here it is, plain as day.

Yes.... you asked me what their agenda was after I said the Daily Mail is agenda driven. I clarified what their agenda was.

Not sure why that needs repeating.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Agenda? To tear strips off Harry and his family and act as though rainbows and teddy bears fly out of Kate's backside. As with every article on the matter.

My reply... without the unnecessary edit.

[Niamh.]

fgs I'd imagine people in Ireland aren't that fussed either way about either couple, they both seem nice and friendly etc etc........no one cares beyond that

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

fgs I'd imagine people in Ireland aren't that fussed either way about either couple, they both seem nice and friendly etc etc........no one cares beyond that

They probably treat it like any polite celeb couple.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Yes.... you asked me what their agenda was after I said the Daily Mail is agenda driven. I clarified what their agenda was.

Not sure why that needs repeating.

You must think people are blind and stupid. How can you even see the keyboard for egg.

And btw, in answer to a comment you made on the other thread, you are again saying things with no proof or evidence whatsoever, like I regurgitate opinions that I read and have none of my own.
Another throwaway comment with no substance.

[Marsh.]

I'm not repeating myself again Jet.

It's literally there for rational people to read.

You asked me the DAILY MAIL'S agenda. The article practically crowns Kate a saint. Not sure how basic you need it explaining.