[Denver]

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075

They are a public health hazard and got what they deserved.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

So innocent people deserve to die?

[Trouble1321075]

Originally Posted by Denver

So innocent people deserve to die?

They are not innonecent. They are endangering millions of people.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075

They are not innonecent. They are endangering millions of people.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Trump is endangering 300 million people

[Trouble1321075]

Originally Posted by Denver

Trump is endangering 300 million people

So you dont want to talk about the crowd that got dispersed any longer?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075

So you dont want to talk about the crowd that got dispersed any longer?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

The crowd who did nothing wrong that was violently dispersed so a fat paedophiles could walk a few feet to take a picture with an upside down bible?

[Trouble1321075]

Originally Posted by Denver

The crowd who did nothing wrong that was violently dispersed so a fat paedophiles could walk a few feet to take a picture with an upside down bible?

They do not have a right to infect people with a fatal virus in the process. They do not have a right to violate curfews. Trump does have a right to personally go acess the damages.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[Trouble1321075]

Originally Posted by Denver

The crowd who did nothing wrong that was violently dispersed so a fat paedophiles could walk a few feet to take a picture with an upside down bible?

The crowd that failed to back up when requested to do so and needed and recieved the appropriate amount of encouragement. That crowd.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075

The crowd that failed to back up when requested to do so and needed and recieved the appropriate amount of encouragement. That crowd.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

The crowd had a legal right to be there

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075

They are not innonecent. They are endangering millions of people.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

by protesting?

[Trouble1321075]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

by protesting?

By not social distancing while they protest. That is a public health health hazard. Their right to protest does not trump the publics right to not die from a disease they are spreading.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075

By not social distancing while they protest. That is a public health health hazard. Their right to protest does not trump the publics right to not die from a disease they are spreading.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Trumo hasn't cared about the virus for 3 months so its habit late caring now after he cause over a 100k deaths

[Trouble1321075]

Originally Posted by Denver

Trumo hasn't cared about the virus for 3 months so its habit late caring now after he cause over a 100k deaths

Again i thought we were discussing the crowd. You keep going off topic.
The crowd according to the lefts criteria posed a public safety risk and have no 1A right.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075

By not social distancing while they protest. That is a public health health hazard. Their right to protest does not trump the publics right to not die from a disease they are spreading.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Then why didn't the shoot and tear gas the lunatics who were protesting because they wanted hair cuts and Starbucks coffee??? Also I thought Murica was the land of the free? Why did they send their military to the middle east to find their freedoms if they can't even protest without being attacked?

[Trouble1321075]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

Then why didn't the shoot and tear gas the lunatics who were protesting because they wanted hair cuts and Starbucks coffee??? Also I thought Murica was the land of the free? Why did they send their military to the middle east to find their freedoms if they can't even protest without being attacked?

Freedom isnt absolute. Your rights dont get to put others in danger. Thats what the left was telling everyone up until theie campagin rally started in Minnesota last week. If people dont have a right to assemble in churches why do they have a right to assemble to protest. Its litterally the same constitutional right.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075

Freedom isnt absolute. Your rights dont get to put others in danger. Thats what the left was telling everyone up until theie campagin rally started in Minnesota last week. If people dont have a right to assemble in churches why do they have a right to assemble to protest. Its litterally the same constitutional right.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

You didn't answer my first question, why is it one rule for a group of white people who want a hair cut and another rule for BLM?? Also wasn't America opening everything up and telling people to go back to work??