[Trouble1321075]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

by protesting?

By not social distancing while they protest. That is a public health health hazard. Their right to protest does not trump the publics right to not die from a disease they are spreading.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075

By not social distancing while they protest. That is a public health health hazard. Their right to protest does not trump the publics right to not die from a disease they are spreading.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Trumo hasn't cared about the virus for 3 months so its habit late caring now after he cause over a 100k deaths

[Trouble1321075]

Originally Posted by Denver

Trumo hasn't cared about the virus for 3 months so its habit late caring now after he cause over a 100k deaths

Again i thought we were discussing the crowd. You keep going off topic.
The crowd according to the lefts criteria posed a public safety risk and have no 1A right.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075

By not social distancing while they protest. That is a public health health hazard. Their right to protest does not trump the publics right to not die from a disease they are spreading.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Then why didn't the shoot and tear gas the lunatics who were protesting because they wanted hair cuts and Starbucks coffee??? Also I thought Murica was the land of the free? Why did they send their military to the middle east to find their freedoms if they can't even protest without being attacked?

[Trouble1321075]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

Then why didn't the shoot and tear gas the lunatics who were protesting because they wanted hair cuts and Starbucks coffee??? Also I thought Murica was the land of the free? Why did they send their military to the middle east to find their freedoms if they can't even protest without being attacked?

Freedom isnt absolute. Your rights dont get to put others in danger. Thats what the left was telling everyone up until theie campagin rally started in Minnesota last week. If people dont have a right to assemble in churches why do they have a right to assemble to protest. Its litterally the same constitutional right.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075

Freedom isnt absolute. Your rights dont get to put others in danger. Thats what the left was telling everyone up until theie campagin rally started in Minnesota last week. If people dont have a right to assemble in churches why do they have a right to assemble to protest. Its litterally the same constitutional right.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

You didn't answer my first question, why is it one rule for a group of white people who want a hair cut and another rule for BLM?? Also wasn't America opening everything up and telling people to go back to work??

[Trouble1321075]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

You didn't answer my first question, why is it one rule for a group of white people who want a hair cut and another rule for BLM?? Also wasn't America opening everything up and telling people to go back to work??

If they decided to tear gas them for refusing to dusperse the police would be within their right to do so


Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk