[Nicky91]

check one post above you Livia

or do you also discredit a well respected historian's claims, and this Browning had went to 2 University's, also graduated from both too, as well as having released a book with his historical facts about holocaust

so if this historian makes a comparison between USA and Nazi-Germany, with Trump, McConnell

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Nicky91

check one post above you Livia

or do you also discredit a well respected historian's claims, and this Browning had went to 2 University's, also graduated from both too, as well as having released a book with his historical facts about holocaust

so if this historian makes a comparison between USA and Nazi-Germany, with Trump, McConnell

The comparison of the USA with Nazi Germany is an insult to everyone who suffered and died.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Livia

The comparison of the USA with Nazi Germany is an insult to everyone who suffered and died.

Very True Livia

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

The comparison of the USA with Nazi Germany is an insult to everyone who suffered and died.

Anyone who knows anything about German history, not just WW2/Hitler but the class divides and rising tensions that lead into both WW's, can make clear and distinct comparisons to the current class war (and it is primarily a class war, not a race war) that has been bubbling up in the US (and in slightly different ways, the UK) in recent years. The comparisons are there to be made. Not to the war and Nazi rule itself, but to the socioeconomic conditions that people with other agendas exploited in order to gain positions of power and influence, and encourage the compliance, that made those atrocities possible.

It might be "offensive", but making analytical comparisons of history in order to identify and hopefully swerve the same issues is the whole point of studying history and politics . If people find these topics too personally offensive/uncomfortable to engage with then it's that individuals prerogative to not engage, but to claim that "no one should do it" because some people might overhear and not like what they're hearing? Meh. Unacademic, illogical and damaging thinking.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Anyone who knows anything about German history, not just WW2/Hitler but the class divides and rising tensions that lead into both WW's, can make clear and distinct comparisons to the current class war (and it is primarily a class war, not a race war) that has been bubbling up in the US (and in slightly different ways, the UK) in recent years. The comparisons are there to be made. Not to the war and Nazi rule itself, but to the socioeconomic conditions that people with other agendas exploited in order to gain positions of power and influence, and encourage the compliance, that made those atrocities possible.

It might be "offensive", but making analytical comparisons of history in order to identify and hopefully swerve the same issues is the whole point of studying history and politics . If people find these topics too personally offensive/uncomfortable to engage with then it's that individuals prerogative to not engage, but to claim that "no one should do it" because some people might overhear and not like what they're hearing? Meh. Unacademic, illogical and damaging thinking.

So.… comparisons with Nazi Germany should just be sucked up? Because you think it unacademic, illogical and damaging.

It's funny to be how gentiles repeatedly tell me what I should be thinking in case I don't understand. Even more insulting.

You may wrongly think that making comparisons between Trump, who's probably finished after his Covid performance, and Hitler is perfectly acceptable. That's your prerogative. But please don't tell me that I'm wrong to disagree. Especially in light of your sig....a bunch of completely out of context Googled quotes from the man who saved this country from the Nazis. Also your prerogative...

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

So.… comparisons with Nazi Germany should just be sucked up? Because you think it unacademic, illogical and damaging.

It's funny to be how gentiles repeatedly tell me what I should be thinking in case I don't understand. Even more insulting.

You may wrongly think that making comparisons between Trump, who's probably finished after his Covid performance, and Hitler is perfectly acceptable. That's your prerogative. But please don't tell me that I'm wrong to disagree. Especially in light of your sig....a bunch of completely out of context Googled quotes from the man who saved this country from the Nazis. Also your prerogative...

I'm not telling you what to think or what your opinions should be - but you're not saying that you are insulted by it, or that you find it offensive, you're stating as fact that it IS inherently insulting and offensive in an attempt to shame people out of doing it. There's one person here trying to shut down opinion and dictate "appropriate conversation" Livia, and it certainly isn't me. I fully accept your right to find these comparisons and conversations difficult and offensive. I don't accept your attempts to shame other people out of having those conversations, and making those comparisons.

You also, presumably, know fine well that comparison and pointing out precedent in no way involves suggesting equivalency? That pointing out that there are valid comparisons to be made between current global politics and early-20th-century politics (which seems undeniable, to me) is not in the slightest the same thing as saying they're identical, nor is it an attempt to argue that Trump is identical to Hitler. The "comparison = equivalence" counter arguments are usually a strawman tactic employed by people who find the comparison confronting or uncomfortable.

I can compare apples to oranges, pears, plums, carrots, and small red family hatchbacks whilst acknowledging that none of them are the same thing.

You're in law. You understand that. You know that pointing out precedent in a previous case is not a claim that two cases are identical. Why do you keep pretending that you're mystified by the concept?

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I'm not telling you what to think or what your opinions should be - but you're not saying that you are insulted by it, or that you find it offensive, you're stating as fact that it IS inherently insulting and offensive in an attempt to shame people out of doing it. There's one person here trying to shut down opinion and dictate "appropriate conversation" Livia, and it certainly isn't me. I fully accept your right to find these comparisons and conversations difficult and offensive. I don't accept your attempts to shame other people out of having those conversations, and making those comparisons.

You also, presumably, know fine well that comparison and pointing out precedent in no way involves suggesting equivalency? That pointing out that there are valid comparisons to be made between current global politics and early-20th-century politics (which seems undeniable, to me) is not in the slightest the same thing as saying they're identical, nor is it an attempt to argue that Trump is identical to Hitler. The "comparison = equivalence" counter arguments are usually a strawman tactic employed by people who find the comparison confronting or uncomfortable.

I can compare apples to oranges, pears, plums, carrots, and small red family hatchbacks whilst acknowledging that none of them are the same thing.

You're in law. You understand that. You know that pointing out precedent in a previous case is not a claim that two cases are identical.
Why do you keep pretending that you're mystified by the concept?

Patronising.

You don't need a Jew in these threads, especially not one who's connected with Israel in any way. It just spoils the party.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

Patronising.



You don't need a Jew in these threads, especially not one who's connected with Israel in any way. It just spoils the party.

You not wanting to have a discussion because you either don't have a response, or most likely just can't be bothered, doesn't make me patronising. It's fine that you don't want a discussion. You could just say so.