[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Erm... Marsh doesn't.

Marsh asks you to provide sources and you either refuse to do so on the basis that you don't have time or continue to post links to the "gossip rags" you also claim to not read.

Funny that.

Your opinion is not influenced by tabloid spin and yet every article you ever post about them comes from the Daily Mail.

Royal correspondents get their articles published in the Daily Mail, the Times etc, how else would they be read but in the press? Unless you expect them to send you a personal copy. I don't read gossip, I read their write ups alone. Are you getting it yet?

Don't lie Marsh, I used to provide plenty of sources, the articles remained unread or ignored so what was the point. I even posted all the names of the Royal Correspondents I respected so people could source what they were saying regarding Meghan and Harry, but all I got was ‘you believe THOSE people, ROYAL CORRESPONDENTS! haha’ from you. No feedback from their articles and no reference to any of them at all. It's all there in past threads, that history isn't erased yet....
I also recommended Royal documentaries but got no response. I posted links to several TV interviews with Royal correspondents and all I got was derision and again no feedback. Just the usual inane one liners aimed to poke and sneer.

Do you know how papers work Marsh? Royal correspondents write their articles which are then published in Daily’s like the Mail or the Times for example. They are usually fair enough and turn out to be accurate - criticism is given and praise is given, depending on the actions of the royal they are referring too.

The out and out gossip rags then pick up the articles and pick out bits to sensationalize often out of context for the gullible to delight in or wring their hands over whichever the case may be....you need to stop reading them, I don't. I once again patiently recommend seeking out Royal correspondents articles. You're welcome.