[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

What do you think?

I think it’s very odd, I don’t see how she could have that many cuts on her head from falling, but at the same time the lack of bloody splatter on the roof, lack of a murder weapon and there being a lack of spatter on him and her having blood on her feet very confusing..

In terms of the actual documentary too I find it drags A LOT, they could cut it down massively to about 7 episodes rather than 13, I don’t care about all these scenes where he’s chatting to his family about the case. ALSO it annoyed me that in the first half of the documentary they didn’t show Denver (?) the SBI agent who testified re the blood splatter. I feel like they painted Mike in a VERY positive light and it kind of came back to bite them because when it comes out that a lot of the evidence (which you don’t even hear about in the first place) has been faked, you’re just like wtf?? Why didn’t they show that in the first place.

Also in the penultimate (?) episode, someone mentions that she was strangled before she was beaten, yet that’s not mentioned once throughout the entire thing.

Thinking about it now, I think it’s more likely that he did actually do it. It’s annoying that the documentary makers have painted him in such a positive light, rather than just giving the viewers all the evidence to decide for themselves