Quote:
Originally Posted by jet
As has just been said on Sky News, there was an agreement with the UK press not to take any photos of them or any royal children unless they were authorised. They walked away from all that knowingly into a lion’s den.
They can live anywhere they want to, but they chose LA, the paparazzi capital of the world? If they really want the privacy they insist they do, does that make any sense?
|
Put yourself in their shoes would you be happy? , yeah so what ?? What about famous actors in Hollywood are you saying they don't deserve any privacy Either? .
This isn't Sandra bullock walking down the street with shades or Chris Hemsworth in a coffee shop ie public places .
If bullock & Hemsworth were in their gardens & homes then it would be crossing the line for paparazzi to photograph & spy on them .
why is thst hard to understand ? Especially when Harry & Meghan have a child they're trying to protect .