[jet]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

That's not really the point though is it Swan , and even if they do decide to do that it's irrelevant.

Arranging a photo or magazine deal is on your terms and it's a mutual agreement. How can you think a drone / paparazzi flying over someone's home without their permission is the same ??? .

Even the biggest lime light lover would still need privacy to recuperate and relax .

As has just been said on Sky News, there was an agreement with the UK press not to take any photos of them or any royal children unless they were authorised. They walked away from all that knowingly into a lion’s den.
They can live anywhere they want to, but they chose LA, the paparazzi capital of the world? If they really want the privacy they insist they do, does that make any sense?