[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Is it though?
I think it's doing a lot of damage tbh. Outside of the fact it was clearly an abusive relationship on both sides, the result of this libel trial is now starting a narrative in the papers (and on news shows) that the abusive woman remains the victim in this scenario, regardless of her own behaviours. Extremely damaging and playing into stereotypes IMO.

They've both contributed to a toxic relationship, but he's the "wife beater" who deserves to be vilified across the newspapers it seems by scum like Dan Wootton, whilst she gets to play act the victim and be the "winner". Nah, doesn't sit right at all.

...but surely we can only look at what’s been ruled on/found to be true...(...I don’t know all of the details, I will say...I haven’t been a huge follower of the case..)...and that’s that 12 cases of abuse against him have been found to be truth ...I don’t really know beyond that, what the possibility of ‘two contributions’ would have been and what bearing they would have on his abuse...because he has been found to be a ‘wife beater’ as such so she is a victim of that finding...