[The Slim Reaper]

Basically Trump has only one way to get the votes, and Biden has a few.

[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Basically Trump has only one way to get the votes, and Biden has a few.

Biden can also get to 290 in theory

since he is gaining ground in PA (i saw what CNN showed us just now in that hour by hour graphic yesterday till now)

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Nicky91

Biden can also get to 290 in theory

since he is gaining ground in PA (i saw what CNN showed us just now in that hour by hour graphic yesterday till now)

In theory he can still hit 306 semi-realistically, although not likely.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

In theory he can still hit 306 semi-realistically, although not likely.

That'd be better than a close one, if it came down to one or two states it won't be over for a looong time, whereas if Trump gets totally buttfucked there's more chance that will be the end of it.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

That'd be better than a close one, if it came down to one or two states it won't be over for a looong time, whereas if Trump gets totally buttfucked there's more chance that will be the end of it.

I agree, anything close he has a chance to con with all the court packing he's been doing, but if he needs to argue in multiple states it's far less likely he gets anyone to take him seriously.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

I agree, anything close he has a chance to con with all the court packing he's been doing, but if he needs to argue in multiple states it's far less likely he gets anyone to take him seriously.

Luckily, so far, I think most of the Trump appointees have been ruling without bias, I think I remember them siding with abortion laws in an abortion issue a while back despite everyone thinking they wouldn't.

I can't see them backing Trump out of loyalty, considering their own positions aren't at risk if he stays or goes, but they probably would be if they ruled against the facts.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Luckily, so far, I think most of the Trump appointees have been ruling without bias, I think I remember them siding with abortion laws in an abortion issue a while back despite everyone thinking they wouldn't.

I can't see them backing Trump out of loyalty, considering their own positions aren't at risk if he stays or goes, but they probably would be if they ruled against the facts.

If they were found guilty of actually messing with mail they would be in huge trouble as well, isn't that a federal offense?

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Luckily, so far, I think most of the Trump appointees have been ruling without bias, I think I remember them siding with abortion laws in an abortion issue a while back despite everyone thinking they wouldn't.

I can't see them backing Trump out of loyalty, considering their own positions aren't at risk if he stays or goes, but they probably would be if they ruled against the facts.

The abortion laws were a supreme court issue when the court was 5-4, and it was the existing justice (Roberts) who was the deciding vote. It's 6-3 now, and Gorsuch and Kavanagh both gave opinions last week which seemed like providing a path to have votes thrown out. ACB has been trying to stop people voting for most of her career.