[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

It makes sense to do the most at risk and caregivers first imo

100 percent the caregivers, I'm with you on that.

But imagine vaccinating the families of those being cared for first, they could then freely visit covid free, whilst they wait for their turn.

I reckon a lot of vulnerable people would prefer that.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by parmnion

100 percent the caregivers, I'm with you on that.

But imagine vaccinating the families of those being cared for first, they could then freely visit covid free, whilst they wait for their turn.

I reckon a lot of vulnerable people would prefer that.

Even the best vaccines don't give protection from the day you receive it and this is no exception, you could have the potential to pass on the virus for weeks after...You might be fine but there is still the risk of infecting others.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Even the best vaccines don't give protection from the day you receive it and this is no exception, you could have the potential to pass on the virus for weeks after...You might be fine but there is still the risk of infecting others.

So therefore the more active should be given it first because the elderly ain't exactly meeting many people apart from thier carers...

Vaccinate the carers first by all means..but then vaccinate the most active so they can become safe from spreading it...get the country going again.

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by parmnion

100 percent the caregivers, I'm with you on that.

But imagine vaccinating the families of those being cared for first, they could then freely visit covid free, whilst they wait for their turn.

I reckon a lot of vulnerable people would prefer that.

with fast testing, family members who test negative twice (I think) will be able to visit relatives