Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-01-2021, 05:26 PM #1
GiRTh's Avatar
GiRTh GiRTh is offline
Iconic Symbolic Historic
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,166

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Jess Impiazzi
Strictly 2017: Davood Ghadami


GiRTh GiRTh is offline
Iconic Symbolic Historic
GiRTh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,166

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Jess Impiazzi
Strictly 2017: Davood Ghadami


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alf View Post
You can't blame twitter for peoples suspicions. The empty Joe Biden rallies compared to Trump's heaving rallies, made them suspicious. Hundreds of eye witnesses testimonies of cheating made them suspicious. The fact that at the end of election night Trump was well in front and when America woke up the next day, Biden was in front, that made them suspicious. The fact Trump improved his 2016 votes by over 11 million, that made them suspicious. The fact Trump improved his vote all over the country except for them few key states in question, that made them suspicious. The fact that every election statitic besides the final result says that Trump won, that made them suspicious.

But if it's easier to ignore all that and just say it was Twitters fault, then go ahead.
Can you further explain the bit in bold because I have no idea what you're on about. Everything else you mentioned is not suspicious.
__________________

Quote:
If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you. - Don Marquis
GiRTh is offline  
Old 08-01-2021, 05:32 PM #2
Alf's Avatar
Alf Alf is offline
Sod orf
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wapping
Posts: 36,277


Alf Alf is offline
Sod orf
Alf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wapping
Posts: 36,277


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GiRTh View Post
Can you further explain the bit in bold because I have no idea what you're on about. Everything else you mentioned is not suspicious.
Trump increased his numbers in every single state from his 2016 results, except for the 5 or
6 six that were in question. Certain states are won were it's said that whoever wins that state, it will pretty much tell you who will win the election, Trump won those states.
Alf is offline  
Old 08-01-2021, 05:41 PM #3
GiRTh's Avatar
GiRTh GiRTh is offline
Iconic Symbolic Historic
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,166

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Jess Impiazzi
Strictly 2017: Davood Ghadami


GiRTh GiRTh is offline
Iconic Symbolic Historic
GiRTh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,166

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Jess Impiazzi
Strictly 2017: Davood Ghadami


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alf View Post
Trump increased his numbers in every single state from his 2016 results, except for the 5 or
6 six that were in question. Certain states are won were it's said that whoever wins that state, it will pretty much tell you who will win the election, Trump won those states.
Not that bit, that's not suspicious. That every statistic stated trump won. Not one that ';ve looked at declared Trump the winner.
__________________

Quote:
If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you. - Don Marquis

Last edited by GiRTh; 08-01-2021 at 05:47 PM.
GiRTh is offline  
Old 08-01-2021, 06:15 PM #4
James's Avatar
James James is offline
Jolly good
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 29,507


James James is offline
Jolly good
James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 29,507


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alf View Post
Trump increased his numbers in every single state from his 2016 results, except for the 5 or

6 six that were in question. Certain states are won were it's said that whoever wins that state, it will pretty much tell you who will win the election, Trump won those states.
He increased his vote count in every state (with the higher turnout), not just the ones that weren't questioned.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20210108-180624_Samsung Internet.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	153.5 KB
ID:	5116   Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20210108-180457_Chrome.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	146.6 KB
ID:	5117  

Last edited by James; 08-01-2021 at 06:26 PM. Reason: Pictures larger
James is offline  
Old 08-01-2021, 05:35 PM #5
Alf's Avatar
Alf Alf is offline
Sod orf
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wapping
Posts: 36,277


Alf Alf is offline
Sod orf
Alf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wapping
Posts: 36,277


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GiRTh View Post
Can you further explain the bit in bold because I have no idea what you're on about. Everything else you mentioned is not suspicious.
They are suspicious to some. Maybe not somebody who wanted the Democrats to win, but other observers do think, eye eye, this looks a bit dodgy.

Last edited by Alf; 08-01-2021 at 05:37 PM.
Alf is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
12, account, ban, hour, permanently, suspend, threatens, trump, twitter


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts