[Ammi]

...I mean, even outside of the U.K. media, there would be world media trying to get that first photo of Meghan in her pregnancy...so they released the photo that they wanted to release...and their announcement was actually quite short and simple and didn’t have any detail, really ..
or anything ‘flowery’ etc...”we can confirm that Archie is going to be a big brother. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are overjoyed to be expecting their second child."


....a USA media article translated the headline to this...for instance..?..

Duchess Meghan pregnant with Baby No. 2 with Prince Harry; reveal has a connection to Diana


...but for many U.K. media, their announcement was translated to this...

"Publicity-Shy Woman Tells 7.67 BN People: I'm Pregnant."



...I mean, it’s just totally impossible to say that Meghan in particular isn’t subjected to extreme negative media whatever she does and whatever she says...because she’s already done wrong and can’t win before she says it and before she does it...found guilty before tried, as it were...

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Meghan will never be able to keep away from the press, she and Harry are too profitable for them. It's the height of naivete to think they could just shut up and be left alone, like there won't be cameras aimed their way wherever they go.

If you can't force the media to leave you alone, your only option is to control how much of an impact they have on your life, otherwise they'll be in control.

Lets be honest here...Meghan loves the press...she courts the press...she simply doesnt like negative press....I mean who does As I have said 100 times before anyone who puts themselves out in the public eye with podcasts etc etc etc...you will have people that like you and some that dont.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Markle is also turning to investing — and is an angel investor in woman-owned coffee brand Clevr, which Winfrey promoted to her 19 million Instagram followers.

https://pagesix.com/2021/02/14/megha...-prince-harry/

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...I mean, even outside of the U.K. media, there would be world media trying to get that first photo of Meghan in her pregnancy...so they released the photo that they wanted to release...and their announcement was actually quite short and simple and didn’t have any detail, really ..
or anything ‘flowery’ etc...”we can confirm that Archie is going to be a big brother. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are overjoyed to be expecting their second child."


....a USA media article translated the headline to this...for instance..?..

Duchess Meghan pregnant with Baby No. 2 with Prince Harry; reveal has a connection to Diana


...but for many U.K. media, their announcement was translated to this...

"Publicity-Shy Woman Tells 7.67 BN People: I'm Pregnant."



...I mean, it’s just totally impossible to say that Meghan in particular isn’t subjected to extreme negative media whatever she does and whatever she says...because she’s already done wrong and can’t win before she says it and before she does it...found guilty before tried, as it were...

Ammi speaking sense as always

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Markle is also turning to investing — and is an angel investor in woman-owned coffee brand Clevr, which Winfrey promoted to her 19 million Instagram followers.

https://pagesix.com/2021/02/14/megha...-prince-harry/

So what? Jesus Christ

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Lets be honest here...Meghan loves the press...she courts the press...she simply doesnt like negative press....I mean who does As I have said 100 times before anyone who puts themselves out in the public eye with podcasts etc etc etc...you will have people that like you and some that dont.

Do you know Meghan personally to make that assumption? How do YOU know she ‘loves the press’?

Sounds likes your just making more assumptions to suit your agenda.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...I mean, even outside of the U.K. media, there would be world media trying to get that first photo of Meghan in her pregnancy...so they released the photo that they wanted to release...and their announcement was actually quite short and simple and didn’t have any detail, really ..
or anything ‘flowery’ etc...”we can confirm that Archie is going to be a big brother. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are overjoyed to be expecting their second child."


....a USA media article translated the headline to this...for instance..?..

Duchess Meghan pregnant with Baby No. 2 with Prince Harry; reveal has a connection to Diana


...but for many U.K. media, their announcement was translated to this...

"Publicity-Shy Woman Tells 7.67 BN People: I'm Pregnant."



...I mean, it’s just totally impossible to say that Meghan in particular isn’t subjected to extreme negative media whatever she does and whatever she says...because she’s already done wrong and can’t win before she says it and before she does it...found guilty before tried, as it were...

The Sun and Star etc have been putting out ****e headlines for years...why anyone takes them seriously beats me.
I am sure there are newspapers that equate in the U.S....then again every Tom Dick and Harry sue for just about everythng over there and it can come at a big price.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Do you know Meghan personally to make that assumption? How do YOU know she ‘loves the press’?

Sounds likes your just making more assumptions to suit your agenda.

[Crimson Dynamo]

It’s only been ten months since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they were
leaving the British royal family in search of “privacy”


---------------------------------------------------
August 2020 Finding Freedom is published - Sunday Times number 1 bestselling biography that tells the real story of Harry and Meghan’s life together
--------------------------------------------------

CBS said in a statement: ‘Winfrey will speak with Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, in a wide-ranging 90 MINUTE interview, covering everything from stepping into life as a Royal, marriage
, motherhood, philanthropic work to how she is handling life under intense public ressure. Later, the two are joined by Prince Harry as they speak about their move to the
United States and their future hopes and dreams for their expanding family.’

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

It’s only been ten months since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they were
leaving the British royal family in search of “privacy”


---------------------------------------------------
August 2020 Finding Freedom is published - Sunday Times number 1 bestselling biography that tells the real story of Harry and Meghan’s life together
--------------------------------------------------

CBS said in a statement: ‘Winfrey will speak with Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, in a wide-ranging 90 MINUTE interview, covering everything from stepping into life as a Royal, marriage
, motherhood, philanthropic work to how she is handling life under intense public ressure. Later, the two are joined by Prince Harry as they speak about their move to the
United States and their future hopes and dreams for their expanding family.’

Harry...the guest

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I know the hypocrisy of it all.


Well they will have their ego's stroked by Oprah...they will get the publicity they crave.
I think this interview will be the beginning of the end...lets hope Harry remains respectful to his family.

What hypocrisy??
Why do you care so much what Harry & Meghan are doing whether it's a photo shoot or an interview??.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

What hypocrisy??
Why do you care so much what Harry & Meghan are doing whether it's a photo shoot or an interview??.

The hypocrisy about their desire for a quiet life....

I care as much about them as you do....I have an opinion on them like you do ....what’s the problem.

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

What hypocrisy??
Why do you care so much what Harry & Meghan are doing whether it's a photo shoot or an interview??.

People are finding it hard to understand what type of privacy Meghan and Harry wanted you know the same type of privacy every other celebrity wants.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by LukeB

People are finding it hard to understand what type of privacy Meghan and Harry wanted you know the same type of privacy every other celebrity wants.

I know.
It's incredible it's like it's thought privacy should be as if they've gone to Mars or somewhere.
Never to be heard or seen again.
Unbelievable.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I know.
It's incredible it's like it's thought privacy should be as if they've gone to Mars or somewhere.
Never to be heard or seen again.
Unbelievable.

...I reckon that some media might have a long Mars reaching lens, Joey...

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...I reckon that some media might have a long Mars reaching lens, Joey...

Well yes, you're likely right there too Ammi.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by LukeB

People are finding it hard to understand what type of privacy Meghan and Harry wanted you know the same type of privacy every other celebrity wants.

what "type" of privacy?


what "type" of privacy involves a PR with an image to the PA to distribute to ALL newspapers?

what "type" of privacy is a 90 minute faux interview with the USA's biggest daytime host who is "new" personal friend with a racial axe to grind?

i mean you genuinely can't make this up


it is astonishing hypocrisy of the Highest level

grade AA

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by LukeB

People are finding it hard to understand what type of privacy Meghan and Harry wanted you know the same type of privacy every other celebrity wants.

Oh the privacy of the private life they spilled to Oprah...soon to be on National TV

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Oh the privacy of the private life they spilled to Oprah...soon to be on National TV

Yup you still don’t understand what privacy people want after people have mentioned it so many time. Are they inviting us into their homes 24/7 all year? No they are doing a TV interview which is rare for them. Every single celebrity wants privacy and do way more publicity stuff than Meghan and Harry.

You also fail to understand this is their control rather than media twisting stuff. That’s what tv interviews are for.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by LukeB

Yup you still don’t understand what privacy people want after people have mentioned it so many time. Are they inviting us into their homes 24/7 all year? No they are doing a TV interview which is rare for them. Every single celebrity wants privacy and do way more publicity stuff than Meghan and Harry.

You also fail to understand this is their control rather than media twisting stuff. That’s what tv interviews are for.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Lets be honest here...Meghan loves the press...she courts the press...she simply doesnt like negative press....I mean who does As I have said 100 times before anyone who puts themselves out in the public eye with podcasts etc etc etc...you will have people that like you and some that dont.

This is all what you want to be true, it's not facts, it's not logic, it's just fantasy.

It's been explained to you why people in the public eye can't easily fade away, especially someone like Meghan who the media knows will generate clicks with every article they write. They won't be allowed to, you either control the narrative or someone else does and to control the narrative, you have to engage in the press on your terms, which is what they and most celebs do.

Ignoring how things work to push a narrative isn't a good look. You can keep ignoring the reality of living in the public eye, but it will never make your narrative any less of a fabrication.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

The hypocrisy about their desire for a quiet life....

I care as much about them as you do....I have an opinion on them like you do ....what’s the problem.

But they're still human beings and are still entitled to peace and quiet, why is it bad to do a photo shoot and a interview.

They didn't disappear from earth they just stood down from royal duties . And they will always be apart of the royal family whether people like it or not.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

But they're still human beings and are still entitled to peace and quiet, why is it bad to do a photo shoot and a interview.

They didn't disappear from earth they just stood down from royal duties . And they will always be apart of the royal family whether people like it or not.

You either want to have peace and quiet or you want to court publicity....you can’t have both. I fully understand the desire to have some parts of your life remain private...but when you put yourself out there constantly with interviews and podcasts and opinions then I’m afraid you have to expect that people will not always see you in the light that you want.
Who is really interested in them ramming their opinions/preachings and sob story down our throats?....Many people I believe are intrigued by the blatant self appreciation and ignorance.

[Mitchell]

Meghan was already having her privacy invaded way too much, her already ****ty father, knows this yet sells stories on her, yet wonders why she wants nothing to do with him, when he is doing his best to help fuel the invasion of her privacy.

Can you imagine the uproar if she hadn’t announced her pregnancy? Cos there’s no flipping way it wouldn’t have got out that she was pregnant, the gammon would be telling us how selfish it is, and how they should’ve told us something so important, whatever Meghan and Harry do, it will never be good enough for some people, and that is the simple fact of it.

[Elliot]

Originally Posted by LukeB

People are finding it hard to understand what type of privacy Meghan and Harry wanted you know the same type of privacy every other celebrity wants.

It’s what happens when you try to project someone as an antagonistic villain, things that would be normal if anyone else did them become malevolent Machiavellian schemes to distance Harry from his family and tear the royals apart. Occam’s razor. If you have to make so many assumptions and twist so many things for something to be true, it probably isn’t true.