[jet]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

Not sure if you watched the full interview but he mentioned trying to educate his families a few times and comes across as someone who still has hope for the monarchy. His whole reason for not saying who was concerned about the babies skin was to not throw anybody under the bus.

Instead he is throwing suspicion on all the senior royals except the Queen and Philip and all except one will be innocent. Very good of him.

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by jet

Instead he is throwing suspicion on all the senior royals except the Queen and Philip and all except one will be innocent. Very good of him.

I mean I would’ve rather he just said who it was too, but I do believe he was trying to protect the person who said it.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

I mean I would’ve rather he just said who it was too, but I do believe he was trying to protect the person who said it.

By implicating every one else?

Er no

It was a devious tactical move

And not by him...

[jet]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

I mean I would’ve rather he just said who it was too, but I do believe he was trying to protect the person who said it.

Then he shouldn't have said anything, because now none of them are protected as people are saying 'I wonder is it him, or her'?

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by jet

Then he shouldn't have said anything, because now none of them are protected as people are saying 'I wonder is it him, or her'?

Some very influential and important people as well..


You could have called treason in days gone by.

[Rustic bauble]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

I mean I would’ve rather he just said who it was too, but I do believe he was trying to protect the person who said it.

Either tell the story in its entirety...or don’t say it at all. It may seem he is protecting someone but all it does is create speculation on his entire family.