[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Meghan was reportedly making $50,000 for every episode of the series, and had an annual salary of roughly $450,000.

"not very successful" - jet

She strived for years to get a decent part, and was in her 30's before she got there - and Suits was finishing after the next series anyway. That kind of money is nothing compared to what well established actors get.
Anyone who didn't watch Suits had never heard of her and probably wouldn't have after she left either - apparently she was a one trick pony. Never watched it myself, hadn't even heard of it.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by jet

She strived for years to get a decent part, and was in her 30's before she got there - and Suits was finishing after the next series anyway. That kind of money is nothing compared to what well established actors get.
Anyone who didn't watch Suits had never heard of her and probably wouldn't have after she left either - apparently she was a one trick pony. Never watched it myself, hadn't even heard of it.

You should watch it. It’s great. You won’t enjoy it though because you’re conditioned to hate Meghan.

[joeysteele]

I watched SUITS, I enjoyed it and thought she was really good in it actually, that's only my view of course.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...I believe that was the general thing said, that the Royal establishment had failed in their care of both Meghan and the Royal staff if it’s something that the investigation proves to have truth in it..the Royal establishment are really not looking great atm in any aspect of their care...but there is ‘fury’ at anything negative against them...

There is no 'fury' Ammi....People that like the Royal Family may just feel more protective over them because they have been publicly accused of some serious issues for the world to see.
They responded and said they would sort this out privately...but Meghan put pay to that by disclosing the nature of a private conversation albeit no details...but creating a lack of trust.
Now I am reading that there is about another 90mins of unseen footage of this interview 'waiting' to be aired. Why would Harry put his family through this. Its like they are on a power trip with intent to hurt and shame. They have moved away...in their 'Happy' place unyet they seem to want some sort of revenge..

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Liam-

If a random American actress could weasel her way into the family and single handedly bring the monarchy to its knees, like people claim she has done, then I’m sorry to break it to you pals, but that would mean it wasn’t very strong in the first place

A two bit actress will not bring the palace to its knees...

[jet]

Originally Posted by Ammi

.... most people on the forum to my recollection showed huge concern for the duty of care to both a Royal family member and to staff members so I’ll presume that you’re referring to social media comments or such like...because that wasn’t the vein on here...the Royal family showed great neglect to not have the accusations investigated fully at the time....

Some focused much more on the timing rather than the accusations of bullying, to my recollection, and not on social media, I've said many times I don't read much social media.
I have also said that they were wrong not to investigate it at the time, I repeated that up thread again.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by jet

She's hardly going to do any lasting damage to the monarchy, not a chance.
A not very successful actress who wanted everything done her way and flounced off in a major strop when it became obvious that 'what Meghan wants Meghan gets' was only heeded by Harry....and she's still eaten up with bitterness or she would never had done such an interview. The more she goes on about how bad they were to her, the more people will turn away.

I don't know how any future businesses working with her could ever trust her not to damn them in public if they don't tow her line. Poison.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

There is no 'fury' Ammi....People that like the Royal Family may just feel more protective over them because they have been publicly accused of some serious issues for the world to see.
They responded and said they would sort this out privately...but Meghan put pay to that by disclosing the nature of a private conversation albeit no details...but creating a lack of trust.
Now I am reading that there is about another 90mins of unseen footage of this interview 'waiting' to be aired. Why would Harry put his family through this. Its like they are on a power trip with intent to hurt and shame. They have moved away...in their 'Happy' place unyet they seem to want some sort of revenge..

...yeah, I totally doubt that there was any ‘fury’ Rusti, as indicated by the ‘furious’ media headline... of which shows no inclination of concern for any family distances...

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Wills friends are okay to do it though yes?

Dunno?

If I was him they wouldn't be my friends anymore...which I can only assume aren't anymore. Nor would I be calling harry my brother.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by jet

Some focused much more on the timing rather than the accusations of bullying, to my recollection, and not on social media, I've said many times I don't read much social media.
I have also said that they were wrong not to investigate it at the time, I repeated that up thread again.

...that’s not correct at all, though... because the timing was mentioned as being 3yrs later and right before the Oprah show...(...and that timing was commented on and echoed again and again by all TV/news media as well...)...it doesn’t change that the focus was firmly on a lack of care shown by the Royal family for both Meghan and Royal staff, if allegations were true..it’s disingenuous to state it as being the main focus and that any concern for alleged bullying was disregarded in favour of that aspect...

[jet]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

There is no 'fury' Ammi....People that like the Royal Family may just feel more protective over them because they have been publicly accused of some serious issues for the world to see.
They responded and said they would sort this out privately...but Meghan put pay to that by disclosing the nature of a private conversation albeit no details...but creating a lack of trust.
Now I am reading that there is about another 90mins of unseen footage of this interview 'waiting' to be aired. Why would Harry put his family through this. Its like they are on a power trip with intent to hurt and shame. They have moved away...in their 'Happy' place unyet they seem to want some sort of revenge..

Yes, seen that about the 'waiting' unseen footage. It's tantamount to blackmail now - the royals better not defend themselves by refuting what we said, or else we'll spill more!
She's a dirty little player and more people will wise up to her tactics and eventually want nothing to do with her in her new life if she takes that path. Who would trust her?

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

A two bit actress will not bring the palace to its knees...

A two-bit actress that has apparently hoodwinked the oldest monarchy and millions of people across the country though, which one is it?

[jet]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...that’s not correct at all, though... because the timing was mentioned as being 3yrs later and right before the Oprah show...(...and that timing was commented on and echoed again and again by all TV/news media as well...)...it doesn’t change that the focus was firmly on a lack of care shown by the Royal family for both Meghan and Royal staff, if allegations were true..it’s disingenuous to state it as being the main focus and that any concern for alleged bullying was disregarded in favour of that aspect...

As I said up thread to Dezzy, and having to repeat:

The women could have come forward themselves to insist the bullying was brought out in the open when they knew the interview was going to be aired to protect themselves. They didn't know what she was going to say about those who worked for her. It is perfectly possible, so your fact isn't a fact at all. We just don't know.

....and, as I said before also, when the bullying news came out, some here focused on the timing, as in "How convenient, just before the interview" as a diversion from the women's claims of being bullied by Meghan. Fact.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Liam-

A two-bit actress that has apparently hoodwinked the oldest monarchy and millions of people across the country though, which one is it?

It's her devoted fans she has hoodwinked, not her detractors or the monarchy.
She plays on the 'victim' mentality of the emotionally vulnerable who relate to her in some cases.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by jet

As I said up thread to Dezzy, and having to repeat:

The women could have come forward themselves to insist the bullying was brought out in the open when they knew the interview was going to be aired to protect themselves. They didn't know what she was going to say about those who worked for her. It is perfectly possible, so your fact isn't a fact at all. We just don't know.

....and, as I said before also, when the bullying news came out, some here focused on the timing, as in "How convenient, just before the interview" as a diversion from the women's claims of being bullied by Meghan. Fact.

...I’m pretty sure that at least one email was sent at the time informing of the concerns and that’s when it should have been fully investigated by third parties....I don’t have time to look up the email but I’m thinking it’s there and I read it at the time...and no, the focus wasn’t on the timing, the timing was mentioned though because that was part of the news, that as I say...all media and TV discussions were also mentioning the timing and questioning it...it’s entirely possible that TV seemed to ‘prioritise it’ but that wasn’t done on here...and if that’s the case with TV media, then i would doubt it would be to divert either...why would they do that, the whole focus for them was anticipating the interview, mostly...

...that it was mentioned here in the entire context that it was reported, of course...fact...it wouldn’t make sense to just discuss part of the story...but that it was more the focus, no...a manipulation of fact which is ironic considering what Meghan is often accused of...

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by jet

Yes, seen that about the 'waiting' unseen footage. It's tantamount to blackmail now - the royals better not defend themselves by refuting what we said, or else we'll spill more!
She's a dirty little player and more people will wise up to her tactics and eventually want nothing to do with her in her new life if she takes that path. Who would trust her?

It is tantamount to Blackmail...otherwise surely if the rest was intended to be shown originally they would have done it in 2 parts ....

Its quite sickening actually..

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Liam-

A two-bit actress that has apparently hoodwinked the oldest monarchy and millions of people across the country though, which one is it?

Shes a two-bit actress and liar which is why the majority in this country have seen right through her and her popularity has plummeted
She has not hoodwinked the Monarchy...they were so focused on Harry being happy I think they just trusted him.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...I’m pretty sure that at least one email was sent at the time informing of the concerns and that’s when it should have been fully investigated by third parties....I don’t have time to look up the email but I’m thinking it’s there and I read it at the time...and no, the focus wasn’t on the timing, the timing was mentioned though because that was part of the news, that as I say...all media and TV discussions were also mentioning the timing and questioning it...it’s entirely possible that TV seemed to ‘prioritise it’ but that wasn’t done on here...and if that’s the case with TV media, then i would doubt it would be to divert either...why would they do that, the whole focus for them was anticipating the interview, mostly...

...that it was mentioned here in the entire context that it was reported, of course...fact...it wouldn’t make sense to just discuss part of the story...but that it was more the focus, no...a manipulation of fact which is ironic considering what Meghan is often accused of...

I think you aren't getting what i'm saying and I don't know what emails or TV have to do with what I was saying happened on here and your post is confusing to me so I'll leave it there.

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Shes a two-bit actress and liar which is why the majority in this country have seen right through her and her popularity has plummeted
She has not hoodwinked the Monarchy...they were so focused on Harry being happy I think they just trusted him.

Okay then

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by jet

I think you aren't getting what i'm saying and I don't know what emails or TV have to do with what I was saying happened on here and your post is confusing to me so I'll leave it there.

....I have to go so I’ll just quickly post this which isn’t ideal but....

On 2 March, an email sent by one of Harry and Meghan’s aides in October 2018 was leaked to The Times newspaper, suggesting Meghan had behaved unacceptably towards Kensington Palace staff.

The couple had married in the May of that year and had been living with Prince William and Kate Middleton at the time.

The leaked email alleges that Markle mistreated two assistants, which left them feeling forced to leave their jobs - the report added that others felt “humiliated” by the Duchess.


...the email informing the palace of worrying behaviour to some Royal staff was sent by an Aide 3yrs ago but only ‘leaked’ just before the Oprah interview...the ‘timing of the leak’ was part of the story’s context as well as discussed widely by all media...not just the email content, itself...but the whole thing of timing....was that reflected in discussions here, most definitely, of course it was...entire context of stories generally are or try to be...but it didn’t become the focus, as suggested and other aspects dismissed ...there was wide ranging concern expressed that there had been a negligence of care to those staff, from what the story was giving us...it’s a manipulation of fact to say that the concern was of the timing was the main focus, which it very much wasn’t....

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Okay then

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

of course Meghan is at the core of all the palaces failings, who knew a newcomer would have such influence.

Omg Queen of Manipulation

[Marsh.]

We've really moved onto "She hit her 30s before reaching the peak in her career"? As an insult?



Considering the vast majority of actors NEVER make it, she stays winning.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Ammi

....I have to go so I’ll just quickly post this which isn’t ideal but....

On 2 March, an email sent by one of Harry and Meghan’s aides in October 2018 was leaked to The Times newspaper, suggesting Meghan had behaved unacceptably towards Kensington Palace staff.

The couple had married in the May of that year and had been living with Prince William and Kate Middleton at the time.

The leaked email alleges that Markle mistreated two assistants, which left them feeling forced to leave their jobs - the report added that others felt “humiliated” by the Duchess.


...the email informing the palace of worrying behaviour to some Royal staff was sent by an Aide 3yrs ago but only ‘leaked’ just before the Oprah interview...the ‘timing of the leak’ was part of the story’s context as well as discussed widely by all media...not just the email content, itself...but the whole thing of timing....was that reflected in discussions here, most definitely, of course it was...entire context of stories generally are or try to be...but it didn’t become the focus, as suggested and other aspects dismissed ...there was wide ranging concern expressed that there had been a negligence of care to those staff, from what the story was giving us...it’s a manipulation of fact to say that the concern was of the timing was the main focus, which it very much wasn’t....

Okay thanks that is clearer. Firstly, the women could have insisted their voices were heard ahead of the interview, because they wouldn't know if she was going to mention them in a derogatory way, so the email was then leaked. Not saying that is what happened, but its possible. We just don't know.

Secondly, I didn't say the timing was the main focus for everyone, because that is untrue, but it certainly was for SOME. In fact, to SOME it was outrage at the timing as their first reaction, and no outrage at the thought that these women may have been bullied by Meghan. Go back and look at the thread...
The narrative wasn't - 'if these women say they were bullied then they felt bullied and we should believe them'!! for some - whereas when Meghan says she was neglected by the Palace it was "if she felt she was, then she was", if she said she had suicidal thoughts, then she did"!!
That is my point. The double standard.

[thesheriff443]

Put it this way, the police and social services plus other agencies knew gangs of Muslim men where abusing vulnerable girls for years

It’s was only when it hit the news big time was the cover up seen.

Only when Meghan decided to do the tell all interview did the bullying allegations come to light.

Palace was wrong Meghan was wrong end of argument