Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
 I'd be willing to make an argument for this being correct grammar. Huawei is a singular entity made up of thousands of people, but Huawei itself is not sentient, thus Huawei cannot be "a spy", yet to say "Huawei employees are spies" doesn't accurately capture the allegation (which IS against the company as a singular, not aimed at any individual employee).
I would accept that "Huawei spies for the CCP" is probably more succinct  .
|
LOL...
Honestly TS, I've never known anyone who produces such articulat arguments when you're this wrong!