[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

Posh and Becks were at Harry and Meghan's wedding.

True, and it was such a small and intimate ceremony with close family and friends so I guess that's a good point.

Lovely to hear that David and Victoria are renewing their vows though.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

True, and it was such a small and intimate ceremony with close family and friends so I guess that's a good point.

Lovely to hear that David and Victoria are renewing their vows though.

Oi, don't diss my points.

David and Victoria still have the massive thrones to live down.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

True, and it was such a small and intimate ceremony with close family and friends so I guess that's a good point.

Just like Brooklyn Beckhams wedding will be a small and intimate ceremony with close family and friends, eh? Nice try though.
You really are such a H&M fanboy.

[jet]

Cambridges lead royal Easter service as the Queen stays home

https://www.theage.com.au/world/euro...18-p5ae2r.html

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by jet

Cambridges lead royal Easter service as the Queen stays home

https://www.theage.com.au/world/euro...18-p5ae2r.html

Crawling back out the woodwork after their tour disaster, no doubt to take attention away from the Invictus Games... how calculating

[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Crawling back out the woodwork after their tour disaster, no doubt to take attention away from the Invictus Games... how calculating

https://news.sky.com/story/why-willi...to-be-12576357

"Why William and Kate's Caribbean tour wasn't the disaster certain photos made it out to be."

Sorry to disappoint you, but it was very far from as ‘disastrous’ as you and certain media badly wanted it to be.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by jet

https://news.sky.com/story/why-willi...to-be-12576357



"Why William and Kate's Caribbean tour wasn't the disaster certain photos made it out to be."



Sorry to disappoint you, but it was very far from as ‘disastrous’ as you and certain media badly wanted it to be.

Right at the top of your own link;

"ANALYSIS: William and Kate's Caribbean trip shows it may be time to rethink Royal overseas tours"

Sounds like a PR disaster to me .

Maybe it wasn't how it appeared in the photographs but...... That doesn't matter. Public perception dictates Royal reality and the PR optics of their tour were simply awful. Too bad so sad.

More from the article;

"Time and again, the answer I got in all three countries was "feelings are mixed here".

not exactly a great positive spin jet. Did you even read this before you sneezed it into the thread?

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Right at the top of your own link;

"ANALYSIS: William and Kate's Caribbean trip shows it may be time to rethink Royal overseas tours"

Sounds like a PR disaster to me .

Maybe it wasn't how it appeared in the photographs but...... That doesn't matter. Public perception dictates Royal reality and the PR optics of their tour were simply awful. Too bad so sad.

More from the article;

"Time and again, the answer I got in all three countries was "feelings are mixed here".

not exactly a great positive spin jet. Did you even read this before you sneezed it into the thread?

Yes I did read it. All of it. I thought it was a fair and balanced analysis. You posted some negative bits, but none of the positive bits.

Like: Outrage thousands of miles from the visit, was getting more traction than the feelings of the people they were actually meeting,

And: Yes, there were protests - but also cheering crowds. (the protests were actually quite small, and Harry got the same when he visited serveral years ago).

Great negative spin though.

BTW Which 'optics' were simply awful that weren't put across in a way that were deceiving, and most now know were deceiving? As I said, it was far from as 'disastrous' as it was being made out to be by certain media.