[The Slim Reaper]

Legal scholars in the states have said this ruling will more than likely have an adverse impact on the rights of others, believing gay marriage is up next.

Your point as I saw it, was that debates around definitions of gender/gender fluidity could potentially make it more likely that legal precedent wiil be undermined, on the very same day that one of the most fundamental rights of body autonomy has been taken away from women, without even a word about gender or gender fluidity. If they've done this without gender debates, why would they even need gender?


You're not making the killer points or gotcha's you believe you are.