[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Rachel Reeves has said on more than one occasion that she plans to be tougher on welfare than the tories, which means those sick and disabled folks won't be getting the help you think they will. In fact, the only thing Starmer hasn't changed his mind on policy-wise is lower business taxes.

The tories believe in the NHS, too, doesn't mean they'll do anything to help it, and Streeting has been pushing for more private sector involvement.

If you vote labour to get tories out, I fully support that, but if you vote for them thinking they have any interest in anything but being in power themselves, then I'm afraid you're setting yourself up for a fall.

You are not being fair there, sorry.
Plus Rachel Reeves has a long record of wanting farness on welfare.

There is NO way she will make the sick and disabled worse off and not given ALL the help they need.

You just said before Labour had NO policies.
Now you're presenting a distorted view of policy from a statement.

Being tough doesn't mean being cruel as this lot have been.

If you really do think the Cons believe in the NHS after the costly top down re-organisation promised to never happen from 2011.
Those reforms STILL causing issues now.
Well sorry, it's not me that's mistaken.

I don't accept I'm setting myself up for a fall.
I'd love another leader than Starmer.
However in the main he has some really caring and more compassionate minded shadow Ministers.
I'm happy to wholly support them.