[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Paint it however you want,but it's obvious Shirley is Bias as hell. She should not be the head judge . Fleur is an amazing dancer , scoring her on the same level as the terrible dancers is just insulting .



Exactly ,which shows she ISN'T a fair judge . And she shouldn't be favouring anyone re: gender or who she fancied. It's so obvious what she's doing. Not even Len was that shockingly bias,and he had some messy odd moments himself.

I mean tbf to all of the judges they'll all have their preferences in who they like and don't like, just like all of us as viewers also have our preferences, there is nothing wrong with that in itself imo.

Where Shirley does cross the line and I'm with you on this, is when she'll score a Fleur contestant the same as a Tony, Matt or James, and Hamza's not a great dancer either.

And I know that some of her fans on DS try to defend her by saying "she judges the individual contestant against their previous performances" which I get that to an extent, but overall Shirley is supposed to give the better dancer the better score on the night, otherwise it makes the leaderboard redundant.

Plus how was Richie's basic routine better than Fleur's more advanced routine? They both had flaws in their dancing so Shirley's argument against Fleur doesn't even hold up in the dance-off.

However tbf to Shirley, my biggest question to all of the judges is why was Tony below Ellie T, Matt & Hamza on the leaderboard when he at least put on a performance for the crowd, the other three just delivered stiff performances without even putting on a big show.

James also deserves the same defence as Tony tbf as well, his performance at least stoodout.