[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by jet

You don’t know if you don’t read the papers I referred to. That’s like saying you hate all novels by a particular author even though you’ve never read any of them. Pure bias.

I’m afraid your father giving up reading the Mail has got nothing whatsoever to do with me Royal watching for many years and finding that the Mail and the Times were proved consistently accurate in their reporting of them over the years. How rude to call my conclusions ‘nonsense’ when you have no way of refuting them.
I will say that I can’t vouch for the accuracy over time of other subjects the Mail or the Times may have reported on.

Yes just get on with it jet.
Yes I'm rude I guess in your eyes, that's your view.

I made a big error even bothering to respond to you.
I will not again.

I have my view on papers you have yours.
I don't believe any of them present news as it should be.
You disagree.

No point in pursuing anything further.

The nonsense I referred to was papers are reliable and truthful sources.
I don't think they are .
You clearly think they are.

So there it is.
I'll follow MY late Father's lead on the Mail not yours.
Plus from being at Uni until 2013 too.
I formed my own view of papers.

Where I became more infuriated daily at their distortion of facts, what people said, and their own agenda presented as news rather than facts.
I think our media is now more likely to misrepresent and misinterpret the real news rather than give the service of just printing it.

I wouldn't waste any money on any of the UKs papers media.
Certainly never the trash that is the Mail.
Top of the list for me to avoid is that one.

That's my position, it's not yours you think they tell the truth.
That's fair enough.