Quote:
Originally Posted by joeysteele
Yes just get on with it jet.
Yes I'm rude I guess in your eyes, that's your view.
I made a big error even bothering to respond to you.
I will not again.
I have my view on papers you have yours.
I don't believe any of them present news as it should be.
You disagree.
No point in pursuing anything further.
The nonsense I referred to was papers are reliable and truthful sources.
I don't think they are .
You clearly think they are.
So there it is.
I'll follow MY late Father's lead on the Mail not yours.
Plus from being at Uni until 2013 too.
I formed my own view of papers.
Where I became more infuriated daily at their distortion of facts, what people said, and their own agenda presented as news rather than facts.
I think our media is now more likely to misteoreseht and misinterpret the real news rather than give the service of just printing it.
I wouldn't waste any money on any of the UKs papers media.
Certainly never the trash that is the Mail.
Top of the list for me to avoud is that one.
That's my position, it's not yours you think they tell the truth.
That's fair enough.
|
Stop twisting my words.
I did not imply ALL papers are truthful, indeed I have no idea how truthful the ones I referred to, The Mail and The Times are on other matters.
I'll repeat their reporting of ROYAL news over the years have turned out in the passage of time to be mainly accurate and as I have been reading the ROYAL news in those two papers for over 20 years, I am in a position to give that opinion and it is rude to continually brush aside my own experiences and insist you know better.
You don't seem to have read my posts properly because you go off on a tangent and refer to things I didn't even say.