[Alf]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

It's difficult to balance out morally because I think the threat that the Tates pose to women, and to the minds of vulnerable or just young men, goes way beyond their direct influence. Truly dangerous individuals peddling a truly dangerous ideology.

They pose absolutely no threat at all to "the deep state" or to systems of power which is why the idea that it's those influences that are trying to get rid of them is especially ridiculous. Can only possibly be believed by those who only encountered the Tates and the false narrative around them in the last 3 to 6 months and have no real idea of what they were all about before that (i.e. aggressive and violent misogyny).

Have you not noticed the huge push in society to feminise men. With huge pushes with the LGBT movement and the trans movement and the message that masculinity is toxic?

Feminine men are going to be much easier to control that masculine men and that's what it's all about. So when people like the Tate's come along with their message of promoting masculinity and get a large following, then they're a threat to the agenda.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Alf

Have you not noticed the huge push in society to feminise men. With huge pushes with the LGBT movement and the trans movement and the message that masculinity is toxic?

Feminine men are going to be much easier to control that masculine men and that's what it's all about. So when people like the Tate's come along with their message of promoting masculinity and get a large following, then they're a threat to the agenda.

Real men don't coerce, control and beat up women Alf. If you think that's an example of a good man then you need to give your head a wobble. He's an angry little coward, an abuser, pathetic. He has incel written all over him. He's just done a good job of selling his brand of bitterness to other sad lonely young blokes off the Internet and then used that money and influence to get I to the heads of young boys and to manipulate women for real. Anyone looking up to Andrew Tate as their model of healthy masculinity is in real, real trouble. They're never going to make his money - it's a pyramid scheme so only the ones at the top will make anything. So all you're left with is a bunch of entitled, muscle-bound, whiney young men who are still getting nowhere in life and nowhere with women, getting angrier by the day. Because what attracts women to Tate is his money and his cars. Not his "masculinity", not his attitude, not his gormless overbite.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Real men don't coerce, control and beat up women Alf. If you think that's an example of a good man then you need to give your head a wobble. He's an angry little coward, an abuser, pathetic. He has incel written all over him. He's just done a good job of selling his brand of bitterness to other sad lonely young blokes off the Internet and then used that money and influence to get I to the heads of young boys and to manipulate women for real. Anyone looking up to Andrew Tate as their model of healthy masculinity is in real, real trouble. They're never going to make his money - it's a pyramid scheme so only the ones at the top will make anything. So all you're left with is a bunch of entitled, muscle-bound, whiney young men who are still getting nowhere in life and nowhere with women, getting angrier by the day. Because what attracts women to Tate is his money and his cars. Not his "masculinity", not his attitude, not his gormless overbite.

Your personal feelings for the guy don't change the facts that he has a huge following of young men that are seeing his message, a message that goes against the Globalists tactics for achieving dominence over the people by feminising the men. And that's why he's locked up right now.

Your problem is that you put feelings over facts simply because you don't like the facts.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Alf

Your personal feelings for the guy don't change the facts that he has a huge following of young men that are seeing his message, a message that goes against the Globalists tactics for achieving dominence over the people by feminising the men. And that's why he's locked up right now.

Your problem is that you put feelings over facts simply because you don't like the facts.

Alf your problem is that you put online fiction over fact, let alone feelings. Andrew Tate is not a freedom fighter and his message does not create strong men, it creates some of the weakest boys I've ever encountered. Frustrated, lonely and completely at the mercy of their feelings of being outcast and rejected. They're dangerous, but not to the government.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Alf your problem is that you put online fiction over fact, let alone feelings. Andrew Tate is not a freedom fighter and his message does not create strong men, it creates some of the weakest boys I've ever encountered. Frustrated, lonely and completely at the mercy of their feelings of being outcast and rejected. They're dangerous, but not to the government.

The fact that you see Andrew Tate as your main danger over the clients of Epstein and Maxwell or the people about to start WWW III tells me that you're way off.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Alf

The fact that you see Andrew Tate as your main danger over the clients of Epstein and Maxwell or the people about to start WWW III tells me that you're way off.

I don't see him as the "main" danger in the world and have never even vaguely suggested that I do. I see him personally as a danger to the women he encounters, and the mindset he encourages to be a danger to pretty much everyone in the long run. Other things also being concerning doesn't negate that concern? If we're talking individuals, for example, I think Elon Musk is ultimately far more dangerous than Tate. What difference does that make? I think lions are more dangerous than pitbulls but I still wouldn't trust a pit bull with my kids.

[The Slim Reaper]

I'm definitely not a fan of Tate, no siree, I'm just concerned about the judicial process in Romania