[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

well according to the article 52% of these searches were done without a parent/guardian there which is a legal requirement.

And six out of ten searches found some thing with or without an adult present

We can go round in circles
I would rather have them searched than not.

[bots]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

And six out of ten searches found some thing with or without an adult present

We can go round in circles
I would rather have them searched than not.

having an adult present doesn't stop the search unless what the police were doing was dodgy. Are you advocating that the police should break the rules if it gets results, because thats how it sounds. Also, the police have a long history of stitching people up and improving their results when not made accountable for their actions. Is that the type of police you want?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

And six out of ten searches found some thing with or without an adult present

We can go round in circles
I would rather have them searched than not.

Why do you think getting a result overrules the Police breaking safeguarding rules, they could have gotten the same results and followed correct procedures?

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Why do you think getting a result overrules the Police breaking safeguarding rules, they could have gotten the same results and followed correct procedures?

It boils down to as a parent you should know we’re your kids are and what they are doing

Kids these days know what they can get away with

13 14 15 17 years olds are raping and murdering kids and adults

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

It boils down to as a parent you should know we’re your gods are and what they are doing

Kids these days know what they can get away with

13 14 15 17 years olds are raping and murdering kids and adults

That has zero to do with Safeguarding rules that Police broke. These rules are there to prevent children being sexually abused by adults in power, everything you're saying has nothing at all to do with that

[Cherie]

I am really surprised the police do this safeguarding works both ways it is there to protect the child but it also there to protect the adults involved from any accusation of wrong doing. If the police cant be trusted to follow the process which is to take the child back to the station and have an appropriate adult present during the search who can we trust. strip searching involves looking at a childs private parts, you would have thought no police officer would want to be doing that without a parent or guardian present, and it makes you wonder as to the motivie of those that do

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I am really surprised the police do this safeguarding works both ways it is there to protect the child but it also there to protect the adults involved from any accusation of wrong doing. If the police cant be trusted to follow the process which is to take the child back to the station and have an appropriate adult present during the search who can we trust. strip searching involves looking at a childs private parts, you would have thought no police officer would want to be doing that without a parent or guardian present, and it makes you wonder as to the motivie of those that do

Exactly.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

That has zero to do with Safeguarding rules that Police broke. These rules are there to prevent children being sexually abused by adults in power, everything you're saying has nothing at all to do with that

Safe guarding starts at home.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Safe guarding starts at home.

Again makes no sense what so ever in what we're discussing........

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Again makes no sense what so ever in what we're discussing........

You have been vocal on here about this subject but what are you actually going to do about it?