[Alf]

Originally Posted by arista

"it might not go the way Sir Kier expects!"


Very Possible
But they have been out of power for a long time
Picking Corbyn wasted years.

So Labour only have their selves to blame.



Starmer is Keeping Brexit
and improving trade
to help him get the voters back.

So Many Dumped Labour
in 2019.


Good on Labour Voters Back Our Brexit

Kier Starmer, the guy who gained his knighthood by turning a blind eye to the most prolific sex offender in the country, Jimmy Saville. Had he have taken the correct action against Saville, his career would have gone downhill, no doubt. He's a guy that chose his career and hunger for power over principle, doing what's right and protecting the victims of Jimmy Saville.

Shame on who ever votes to put him in charge. You'd have to have zero morals to do so.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Alf

Kier Starmer, the guy who gained his knighthood by turning a blind eye to the most prolific sex offender in the country, Jimmy Saville. Had he have taken the correct action against Saville, his career would have gone downhill, no doubt. He's a guy that chose his career and hunger for power over principle, doing what's right and protecting the victims of Jimmy Saville.

Shame on who ever votes to put him in charge. You'd have to have zero morals to do so.

Shame on me then because I will be voting for Labour.
Plus I've extremely good morals thank you instilled in me from my parents and grandparents

Maybe you'd like to too ask who was possibly protecting Saville mostly and who one of his greatest admirers was.
Namely the Con Party and then Mrs Thatcher who all helped enable him to get his very high profile and even gave him a Knighthood.

It wasn't just down to Starmer whether he was prosecuted or not.
He should have been no doubt.
However no ONE person is responsible that he wasn't from the protective ring there clearly was around him.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Shame on me then because I will be voting for Labour.
Plus I've extremely good morals thank you instilled in me from my parents and grandparents

Maybe you'd like to too ask who was possibly protecting Saville mostly and who one of his greatest admirers was.
Namely the Con Party and then Mrs Thatcher who all helped enable him to get his very high profile and even gave him a Knighthood.

It wasn't just down to Starmer whether he was prosecuted or not.
He should have been no doubt.
However no ONE person is responsible that he wasn't from the protective there ckeerkybwas around him.

Margaret Thatcher is dead. The public were not aware of Saville's crimes when voting her in.

Starmer is alive and hoping to be the Prime minister. We now know about Saville's crimes and how Starmer turned a blind eye to them when it was his job to prosecute them.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Alf

Margaret Thatcher is dead. The public were not aware of Saville's crimes when voting her in.

Starmer is alive and hoping to be the Prime minister. We now know about Saville's crimes and how Starmer turned a blind eye to them when it was his job to prosecute them.

No you don't know at all.

Plus Thatcher wasn't dead when she fought to get him his Knighthood.
Just how many doors did that Knighthood open up for him.

You can selectively ignore that if you wish.
You only however weaken further your more uninforned statement.

[Christmas Lights]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

No you don't know at all.

Plus Thatcher wasn't dead when she fought to get him his Knighthood.
Just how many doors did that Knighthood open up for him.

You can selectively ignore that if you wish.
You only however weaken further your more uninforned statement.

Charles was besties with Savile aswell. It looked like Savile had him in his pocket.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Charles was besties with Savile aswell. It looked like Savile had him in his pocket.

Yes he was a favourite of the Royals too.

He did though have leading Cons and Thatcher firmly in his camp.

He should have been prosecuted, however Starmer was not one of the investigative lawyers.
He could only act on what was presented.
Which wasn't enough to prosecute.

He stated after all the revelations,which flooded in more after Saville's death, that changes to prosecutions of this nature would be strengthened.

I am no fan of Starmer, however whoever, police, detectives and lawyers who worked on the Saville allegations while he was alive.
It appears didn't present enough to prosecute.
So he'd have to stick to only what was said in the documents presented.

Were the lawyers and even the police leaned on?
Who knows.

Saville was evil.
He had strong influential friends in high places, such as in the Con government and in Thatcher.
As you stated Charles too.
Being fair to them, were they all fooled by him too?
Because he was clearly one vile, evil devious individual.
Even to having hospitals trust him and give him keys to hospital wards.

I say again though.
The Knighthood FOUGHT for him by Thatcher, how many more doors to vulnerable victims did that help open up for him.

[BBDodge]

Originally Posted by Alf

Yes they did, and Kier Starmer was one of them and he was in a position to prosecute Saville, and he wants our vote to be Prime Minister.

No he wasn't. The case didn't escalate beyond local level as no-one was prepared to testify in court.