[user104658]

Know what rly sux?

Increasingly in this "war", it's becoming apparent that the "sides" are;

1) People who want free reign access for male-bodied people in women's spaces and who won't acknowledge the significant mental health aspect often present in transgenderism.

2) Thick-as-mince bible thumpers.


Surely on THIS occasion, it's OK to be a hardline "both-and-neither-sides" centrist? Please? Please don't make me choose from an assortment of dystopian nightmares .

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Know what rly sux?

Increasingly in this "war", it's becoming apparent that the "sides" are;

1) People who want free reign access for male-bodied people in women's spaces and who won't acknowledge the significant mental health aspect often present in transgenderism.

2) Thick-as-mince bible thumpers.


Surely on THIS occasion, it's OK to be a hardline "both-and-neither-sides" centrist? Please? Please don't make me choose from an assortment of dystopian nightmares .

What group are you in?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

What group are you in?

Neither, that's my point. I don't believe that male-bodied people should be in women's spaces and I think the risks are very real.

Unlike God and the Baby Jesus who are imaginary fairytales.

I actively despise organised religion but at this point the entire debate has been hijacked by the god squad who are ALSO just as dangerous.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Neither, that's my point. I don't believe that male-bodied people should be in women's spaces and I think the risks are very real.

Unlike God and the Baby Jesus who are imaginary fairytales.

I actively despise organised religion but at this point the entire debate has been hijacked by the god squad who are ALSO just as dangerous.

I'm on this side too, there aren't just two