[smudgie]

As a Trish fan, if these tweets are actually real and not been hacked then I will be disappointed.
I won’t make excuses for her age being in her twenties.
That is like saying people over a certain age can say what they wish as they are of the older generation.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by smudgie

As a Trish fan, if these tweets are actually real and not been hacked then I will be disappointed.
I won’t make excuses for her age being in her twenties.
That is like saying people over a certain age can say what they wish as they are of the older generation.

That is exactly my stance as well

I’ll be truly saddened as I just saw brave and caring young woman in the house .. fighting other people’s battles at her own expense.

It’s virtually inconceivable that someone who had shown so much common sense and wisdom in the house and in such a pressurised environment can have written those offensive tweets


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by smudgie

As a Trish fan, if these tweets are actually real and not been hacked then I will be disappointed.
I won’t make excuses for her age being in her twenties.
That is like saying people over a certain age can say what they wish as they are of the older generation.

…yeah absolutely, smudgie…everything you’ve said really….I’m a bit of an OCD person with stuff like social media etc and wanting it to be confirmed and verified, as it were…


…I was just this minute looking at DS…and they’ve closed their thread now…this was their post in closing…

Hi guys

While you can talk about someone's tweets if they are confirmed (we don't know if these tweets are real or not), attacking anyone, whether they be public figures or other forum members, is not acceptable here. This thread has gone in a problematic direction and it will now be closed.

DS


…what I don’t know is…whether it means it’s problematic to discuss tweets to the extent they were on DS in general….from any legal aspect/and that’s the ‘problematic’….or it’s stepping outside their own forum rules and that’s the thing…

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Ammi

…yeah absolutely, smudgie…everything you’ve said really….I’m a bit of an OCD person with stuff like social media etc and wanting it to be confirmed and verified, as it were…


…I was just this minute looking at DS…and they’ve closed their thread now…this was their post in closing…

Hi guys

While you can talk about someone's tweets if they are confirmed (we don't know if these tweets are real or not), attacking anyone, whether they be public figures or other forum members, is not acceptable here. This thread has gone in a problematic direction and it will now be closed.

DS


…what I don’t know is…whether it means it’s problematic to discuss tweets to the extent they were on DS in general….from any legal aspect/and that’s the ‘problematic’….or it’s stepping outside their own forum rules and that’s the thing…

That’s what I was getting at .. until we know for sure that they really are her tweets then we as a forum should be careful what we are saying .. breaking libel laws are serious matters


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Zizu

That’s what I was getting at .. until we know for sure that they really are her tweets then we as a forum should be careful what we are saying .. breaking libel laws are serious matters


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

It's not libelous to resond to what we might at the time assume to be authentic tweets.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

It's not libelous to resond to what we might at the time assume to be authentic tweets.

Are you sure ?

Looks like the DigitalSpy lawyers hold a different view on the matter


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Are you sure ?

Looks like the DigitalSpy lawyers hold a different view on the matter


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

There are no legal issues publishing those tweets, they were all in the public domain

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

There are no legal issues publishing those tweets, they were all in the public domain

We don’t know if her account has been compromised though



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

There are no legal issues publishing those tweets, they were all in the public domain

…..yeah, in giving it some thought…that’s a bit my final thought for the moment as well../Jerry Springer….I think the ‘problematic’ is more forum rules and the breaking of that was becoming problematic to moderate without banning so many members…

[Christmas Lights]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

There are no legal issues publishing those tweets, they were all in the public domain

That's the problem with social media,once it's out there it's out there.

I just wish there was this same outrage for other disgusting tweets & messages out there.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Are you sure ?

Looks like the DigitalSpy lawyers hold a different view on the matter


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I think I read somewhere that threads can be closed for other reasons x

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

I think I read somewhere that threads can be closed for other reasons x

…the moderators are having a cup of tea, atm…/…reason…?…

[Christmas Lights]

Originally Posted by Zizu

That’s what I was getting at .. until we know for sure that they really are her tweets then we as a forum should be careful what we are saying .. breaking libel laws are serious matters


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I don't think we'll get a proper explanation. I just think she'll be missing from L& L tonight.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Zizu

That’s what I was getting at .. until we know for sure that they really are her tweets then we as a forum should be careful what we are saying .. breaking libel laws are serious matters


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

…I can’t be certain obviously but I think it’s more forum rules that were being broken which was becoming problematic….I’m thinking that in the middle of season and heading for the final, they didn’t want to think about big numbers of members being banned in trying to keep it all on track etc…I just personally need to have social media stuff confirmed absolutely for personal association …

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Zizu

That’s what I was getting at .. until we know for sure that they really are her tweets then we as a forum should be careful what we are saying .. breaking libel laws are serious matters


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

The only person in trouble in that scenario is the fake account, our discussions are merely the result of the crime, so if it is fake, the more we criticize and ridicule the severe the punishment could be to the fake account holder. So it is in your interest to get stuck in if you believe it's a fake account.

[bots]

Originally Posted by smudgie

As a Trish fan, if these tweets are actually real and not been hacked then I will be disappointed.
I won’t make excuses for her age being in her twenties.
That is like saying people over a certain age can say what they wish as they are of the older generation.

The last bad tweet was in 2019, so it's not even that historical and to put it in perspective, even with the older tweets, she was still older when she wrote them than Tom is now, so using some peoples reasoning, is Tom not responsible for his words and actions? - That is ridiculous

[White Christmas]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

The last bad tweet was in 2019, so it's not even that historical and to put it in perspective, even with the older tweets, she was still older when she wrote them than Tom is now, so using some peoples reasoning, is Tom not responsible for his words and actions? - That is ridiculous

What about the one from April 2023?