Home Menu

Site Navigation


Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 27-02-2024, 12:48 PM #6
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bitontheslide View Post
the sentences are all determined by cold, hard guidelines that judges are allowed to adjust by agreed margins depending on specific circumstances. It's done this way for consistency. So, while we may subjectively say thats lenient or thats harsh, there is very little room for manoeuvre regarding sentences
I mean, semantics really. We can say that the guidelines are too lenient.

The simple reality though is that there isn't enough prison capacity to keep people in longer. Although in my opinion, the solution is non-custodial punishments for non-violent criminals and use all of the available prison space for those who pose a clear physical threat to the public.

Last edited by user104658; 27-02-2024 at 12:49 PM.
user104658 is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
distressing’, leniency, sentencing…, ‘extreme


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts