| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | |||
|
||||
|
Crimson Dynamo | The voice of reason
|
So, Rayner buys a house on Vicarage Road
She marries and - as this document shows - changes her primary address to be Lowndes Lane, her husband’s house 5 years later she sells her house on Vicarage Road. For a profit which, as it wasn’t her primary address, should’ve been taxable. But she avoided paying tax by claiming Vicarage Road *was* her primary address. But according to this document, it wasn’t. So did she lie on the document? Or is she lying now? (info published by Guido Fawks) |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|